Intel Celeron E3400 vs AMD A10-5757M

Last updated: 2024-04-15

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Celeron E3400		AMD A10-5757M
CPU comparison Intel Celeron E3400 or AMD A10-5757M - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results. The Intel Celeron E3400 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.60 GHz. Up to 16 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron E3400 was released in Q1/2010. The AMD A10-5757M has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.50 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD A10-5757M was released in Q2/2013.

Intel Celeron (165)	Family	AMD A (112)
Intel Celeron E3000 (3)	CPU group	AMD A10-5000M (3)
1	Generation	3
Wolfdale (Penryn)	Architecture	Richland (Piledriver)
Desktop / Server	Segment	Mobile
--	Predecessor	--
--	Successor	--

CPU Cores and Base Frequency The Intel Celeron E3400 is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.60 GHz. The AMD A10-5757M has 4 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz).
Intel Celeron E3400	Characteristic	AMD A10-5757M
2	Cores	4
2	Threads	4
normal	Core architecture	normal
No	Hyperthreading	No
Yes	Overclocking ?	No
2.60 GHz	Frequency	2.50 GHz
--	Turbo Frequency (1 Core)	3.50 GHz
--	Turbo Frequency (All Cores)	3.50 GHz

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.
Intel Celeron E3400	Characteristic	AMD A10-5757M
--	AI hardware	--
--	AI specifications	--

Internal Graphics The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.
no iGPU	GPU	AMD Radeon HD 8650G
	GPU frequency	0.53 GHz
--	GPU (Turbo)	0.72 GHz
--	GPU Generation	5
	Technology	32 nm
	Max. displays	2
--	Compute units	6
--	Shader	384
No	Hardware Raytracing	No
No	Frame Generation	No
--	Max. GPU Memory	2 GB
--	DirectX Version	11

Hardware codec support A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
no iGPU	GPU	AMD Radeon HD 8650G
No	Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit)	No
No	Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit)	No
No	Codec h264	Decode
No	Codec VP9	No
No	Codec VP8	No
No	Codec AV1	No
No	Codec AVC	Decode
No	Codec VC-1	Decode
No	Codec JPEG	Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe The Intel Celeron E3400 supports a maximum of 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD A10-5757M can connect up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels.
Intel Celeron E3400	Characteristic	AMD A10-5757M
DDR3-1066, DDR2-800	Memory	DDR3-1600
16 GB	Max. Memory
2 (Dual Channel)	Memory channels	2 (Dual Channel)
17.1 GB/s	Max. Bandwidth	25.6 GB/s
No	ECC	No
1.00 MB	L2 Cache	--
--	L3 Cache	4.00 MB
--	PCIe version	--
--	PCIe lanes	--
--	PCIe Bandwidth	--
Thermal Management The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Celeron E3400 has a TDP of 65 W, that of the AMD A10-5757M is 35 W.
Intel Celeron E3400	Characteristic	AMD A10-5757M
65 W	TDP (PL1 / PBP)	35 W
--	TDP (PL2)	--
--	TDP up	--
--	TDP down	--
--	Tjunction max.	--
Technical details The Intel Celeron E3400 has a 1.00 MB cache, while the AMD A10-5757M cache has a total of 4.00 MB.
Intel Celeron E3400	Characteristic	AMD A10-5757M
45 nm	Technology	32 nm
Monolithic	Chip design	Unknown
x86-64 (64 bit)	Instruction set (ISA)	x86-64 (64 bit)
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3	ISA extensions	SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
LGA 775	Socket	FP2
VT-x	Virtualization	AMD-V
No	AES-NI	Yes
Windows 10, Linux	Operating systems
Q1/2010	Release date	Q2/2013
42 $	Release price	--

show more data		show more data

Intel Celeron E3400 2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz buy now on Amazon and save! AMD A10-5757M 4C 4T @ 2.50 GHz (3.50 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!

Rate these processors

Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks

Intel Celeron E3400 (95%)

AMD A10-5757M (100%)

⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks

Intel Celeron E3400 (47%)

AMD A10-5757M (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Intel Celeron E3400 2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz	355 (95%)
	AMD A10-5757M 4C 4T @ 3.50 GHz	374 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	Intel Celeron E3400 2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz	624 (68%)
	AMD A10-5757M 4C 4T @ 3.50 GHz	917 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.


	Intel Celeron E3400 2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz	846 (26%)
	AMD A10-5757M 4C 4T @ 3.50 GHz	3278 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.


	Intel Celeron E3400 @ 0.00 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD A10-5757M AMD Radeon HD 8650G @ 0.72 GHz	553 (100%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.


	Intel Celeron E3400 2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz	412 (100%)
	AMD A10-5757M 4C 4T @ 2.50 GHz	0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Intel Celeron E3400 2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD A10-5757M 4C 4T @ 3.50 GHz	73 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	Intel Celeron E3400 2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD A10-5757M 4C 4T @ 3.50 GHz	210 (100%)

Devices using this processor
Intel Celeron E3400	AMD A10-5757M
Unknown	Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs


1.		AMD A10-7300 vs AMD A10-5757M
2.		AMD A10-5757M vs Intel Core i5-4200U
3.		AMD A10-5750M vs AMD A10-5757M
4.		AMD A10-5757M vs Intel Core i3-4100M
5.		Intel Celeron G1630 vs AMD A10-5757M
6.		Intel Core i3-3227U vs AMD A10-5757M
7.		Intel Core i5-4200M vs AMD A10-5757M
8.		Intel Core i7-4770K vs AMD A10-5757M
9.		Intel Core i5-2500k vs AMD A10-5757M
10.		Intel Core i3-3210 vs AMD A10-5757M