Intel Celeron E3200 vs Samsung Exynos 7420
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Celeron E3200 | Samsung Exynos 7420 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Celeron E3200 or Samsung Exynos 7420 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Celeron E3200 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.40 GHz. Up to 16 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron E3200 was released in Q3/2009. The Samsung Exynos 7420 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.10 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 7420 was released in Q2/2015. |
||
| Intel Celeron (165) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| Intel Celeron E3000 (3) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 7420 (1) |
| 1 | Generation | 1 |
| Wolfdale (Penryn) | Architecture | Cortex-A57 / Cortex-A53 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Celeron E3200 has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Celeron E3200 is 2.40 GHz while the Samsung Exynos 7420 has 8 CPU cores and 8 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 7420 is at 2.10 GHz. |
||
| Intel Celeron E3200 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7420 |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| Yes | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.40 GHz 2x Core |
A-Core | 2.10 GHz 4x Cortex-A57 |
| -- | B-Core | 1.50 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The Intel Celeron E3200 or Samsung Exynos 7420 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 |
| GPU frequency | 0.70 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 0.77 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | Midgard 3 |
| Technology | 28nm | |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| -- | Compute units | 8 |
| -- | Shader | 128 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | 11 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Celeron E3200 can use up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 17.1 GB/s. The Samsung Exynos 7420 supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --. |
||
| Intel Celeron E3200 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7420 |
| DDR3-1066, DDR2-800 | Memory | LPDDR4-1600 |
| 16 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| 17.1 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| No | ECC | No |
| 1.00 MB | L2 Cache | 0.51 MB |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Celeron E3200 is 65 W, while the Samsung Exynos 7420 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Intel Celeron E3200 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7420 |
| 65 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Celeron E3200 is manufactured in 45 nm and has 1.00 MB cache. The Samsung Exynos 7420 is manufactured in 14 nm and has a 0.51 MB cache. |
||
| Intel Celeron E3200 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7420 |
| 45 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 | ISA extensions | -- |
| LGA 775 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x | Virtualization | None |
| No | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q3/2009 | Release date | Q2/2015 |
| 47 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
2C 2T @ 2.40 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Celeron E3200
2C 2T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 7420
8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Celeron E3200
2C 2T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7420
8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Celeron E3200
2C 2T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7420
8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
Intel Celeron E3200
2C 2T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7420
8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
Intel Celeron E3200
2C 2T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7420
8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Celeron E3200
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7420
ARM Mali-T760 MP8 @ 0.77 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
Intel Celeron E3200
2C 2T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7420
8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Celeron E3200 | Samsung Exynos 7420 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
