Intel Celeron E1200 vs AMD Phenom II X4 980
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Celeron E1200 | AMD Phenom II X4 980 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Celeron E1200 or AMD Phenom II X4 980 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Celeron E1200 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.60 GHz. Up to 16 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron E1200 was released in Q1/2008. The AMD Phenom II X4 980 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.70 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD Phenom II X4 980 was released in Q2/2011. |
||
| Intel Celeron (165) | Family | AMD Phenom II (52) |
| Intel Celeron E1000 (4) | CPU group | AMD Phenom II - 800/900 (23) |
| 1 | Generation | 4 |
| Conroe (Core) | Architecture | Deneb (K10) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Celeron E1200 has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Celeron E1200 is 1.60 GHz while the AMD Phenom II X4 980 has 4 CPU cores and 4 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD Phenom II X4 980 is at 3.70 GHz. |
||
| Intel Celeron E1200 | Characteristic | AMD Phenom II X4 980 |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | Yes |
| 1.60 GHz | Frequency | 3.70 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Celeron E1200 can use up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 17.1 GB/s. The AMD Phenom II X4 980 supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 21.3 GB/s. |
||
| Intel Celeron E1200 | Characteristic | AMD Phenom II X4 980 |
| DDR3-1066, DDR2-800 | Memory | DDR3-1333, DDR2-1066 |
| 16 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 17.1 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 21.3 GB/s |
| No | ECC | No |
| 0.50 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 6.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Celeron E1200 is 65 W, while the AMD Phenom II X4 980 has a TDP of 125 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Intel Celeron E1200 | Characteristic | AMD Phenom II X4 980 |
| 65 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 125 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Celeron E1200 is manufactured in 65 nm and has 0.50 MB cache. The AMD Phenom II X4 980 is manufactured in 45 nm and has a 6.00 MB cache. |
||
| Intel Celeron E1200 | Characteristic | AMD Phenom II X4 980 |
| 65 nm | Technology | 45 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 | ISA extensions | SSE3, SSE4a |
| LGA 775 | Socket | AM3 |
| None | Virtualization | AMD-V |
| No | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q1/2008 | Release date | Q2/2011 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
2C 2T @ 1.60 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
4C 4T @ 3.70 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 0 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
Intel Celeron E1200
2C 2T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
|
AMD Phenom II X4 980
4C 4T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Celeron E1200
2C 2T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 980
4C 4T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Celeron E1200
2C 2T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 980
4C 4T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Celeron E1200
2C 2T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 980
4C 4T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Celeron E1200
2C 2T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 980
4C 4T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Celeron E1200 | AMD Phenom II X4 980 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
