Intel Celeron 430 vs AMD EPYC 7702P
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Celeron 430 | AMD EPYC 7702P | |
CPU comparisonIntel Celeron 430 or AMD EPYC 7702P - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Celeron 430 has 1 cores with 1 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.80 GHz. Up to 16 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron 430 was released in Q2/2007. The AMD EPYC 7702P has 64 cores with 128 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.35 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7702P was released in Q3/2019. |
||
| Intel Celeron (165) | Family | AMD EPYC (129) |
| Intel Celeron 400 (4) | CPU group | AMD EPYC 7002 (24) |
| 1 | Generation | 2 |
| Conroe (Core) | Architecture | Rome (Zen 2) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Celeron 430 has 1 CPU cores and can calculate 1 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Celeron 430 is 1.80 GHz while the AMD EPYC 7702P has 64 CPU cores and 128 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7702P is at 2.00 GHz (3.35 GHz). |
||
| Intel Celeron 430 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7702P |
| 1 | Cores | 64 |
| 1 | Threads | 128 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 1.80 GHz | Frequency | 2.00 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.35 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 2.50 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Celeron 430 can use up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 17.1 GB/s. The AMD EPYC 7702P supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 51.2 GB/s. |
||
| Intel Celeron 430 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7702P |
| DDR3-1066, DDR2-800 | Memory | DDR4-3200 |
| 16 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 8 (Octa Channel) |
| 17.1 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| 0.50 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 256.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | 4.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 128 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 252.0 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Celeron 430 is 35 W, while the AMD EPYC 7702P has a TDP of 200 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Intel Celeron 430 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7702P |
| 35 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 200 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Celeron 430 is manufactured in 65 nm and has 0.50 MB cache. The AMD EPYC 7702P is manufactured in 7 nm and has a 256.00 MB cache. |
||
| Intel Celeron 430 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7702P |
| 65 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| LGA 775 | Socket | SP3 |
| None | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q2/2007 | Release date | Q3/2019 |
| -- | Release price | 7500 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
1C 1T @ 1.80 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
64C 128T @ 2.00 GHz (3.35 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Celeron 430
1C 1T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
|
AMD EPYC 7702P
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Celeron 430
1C 1T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702P
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Celeron 430
1C 1T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702P
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Celeron 430
1C 1T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702P
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Celeron 430
1C 1T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702P
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
Intel Celeron 430
1C 1T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702P
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
Intel Celeron 430
1C 1T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702P
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Celeron 430
1C 1T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702P
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Celeron 430
1C 1T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702P
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Celeron 430 | AMD EPYC 7702P |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
