Intel Celeron 430 vs AMD EPYC 7702P

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Celeron 430 CPU1 vs CPU2 AMD EPYC 7702P
Intel Celeron 430 AMD EPYC 7702P

CPU comparison

Intel Celeron 430 or AMD EPYC 7702P - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The Intel Celeron 430 has 1 cores with 1 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.80 GHz. Up to 16 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron 430 was released in Q2/2007.

The AMD EPYC 7702P has 64 cores with 128 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.35 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7702P was released in Q3/2019.
Intel Celeron (165) Family AMD EPYC (129)
Intel Celeron 400 (4) CPU group AMD EPYC 7002 (24)
1 Generation 2
Conroe (Core) Architecture Rome (Zen 2)
Desktop / Server Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Intel Celeron 430 has 1 CPU cores and can calculate 1 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Celeron 430 is 1.80 GHz while the AMD EPYC 7702P has 64 CPU cores and 128 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7702P is at 2.00 GHz (3.35 GHz).

Intel Celeron 430 Characteristic AMD EPYC 7702P
1 Cores 64
1 Threads 128
normal Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking ? No
1.80 GHz Frequency 2.00 GHz
-- Turbo Frequency (1 Core) 3.35 GHz
-- Turbo Frequency (All Cores) 2.50 GHz

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

Intel Celeron 430 Characteristic AMD EPYC 7702P
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

The Intel Celeron 430 or AMD EPYC 7702P has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.

no iGPU GPU no iGPU
GPU frequency --
-- GPU (Turbo) --
-- GPU Generation --
Technology
Max. displays
-- Compute units --
-- Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory --
-- DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

no iGPU GPU no iGPU
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
No Codec h264 No
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC No
No Codec VC-1 No
No Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The Intel Celeron 430 can use up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 17.1 GB/s. The AMD EPYC 7702P supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 51.2 GB/s.

Intel Celeron 430 Characteristic AMD EPYC 7702P
DDR3-1066, DDR2-800 Memory DDR4-3200
16 GB Max. Memory
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 8 (Octa Channel)
17.1 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 51.2 GB/s
No ECC Yes
0.50 MB L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache 256.00 MB
-- PCIe version 4.0
-- PCIe lanes 128
-- PCIe Bandwidth 252.0 GB/s

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Celeron 430 is 35 W, while the AMD EPYC 7702P has a TDP of 200 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.

Intel Celeron 430 Characteristic AMD EPYC 7702P
35 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 200 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Intel Celeron 430 is manufactured in 65 nm and has 0.50 MB cache. The AMD EPYC 7702P is manufactured in 7 nm and has a 256.00 MB cache.

Intel Celeron 430 Characteristic AMD EPYC 7702P
65 nm Technology 7 nm
Monolithic Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 ISA extensions SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
LGA 775 Socket SP3
None Virtualization AMD-V, SVM
No AES-NI Yes
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q2/2007 Release date Q3/2019
-- Release price 7500 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Intel Celeron 430 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 1.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the AMD EPYC 7702P to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Intel Celeron 430 (22%)
AMD EPYC 7702P (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Intel Celeron 430 (1%)
AMD EPYC 7702P (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Celeron 430 Intel Celeron 430
1C 1T @ 1.80 GHz
225 (22%)
AMD EPYC 7702P AMD EPYC 7702P
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz
1008 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Celeron 430 Intel Celeron 430
1C 1T @ 1.80 GHz
225 (1%)
AMD EPYC 7702P AMD EPYC 7702P
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz
38494 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Celeron 430 Intel Celeron 430
1C 1T @ 1.80 GHz
292 (0%)
AMD EPYC 7702P AMD EPYC 7702P
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz
62009 (100%)

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Celeron 430 Intel Celeron 430
1C 1T @ 1.80 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD EPYC 7702P AMD EPYC 7702P
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz
996 (100%)

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Celeron 430 Intel Celeron 430
1C 1T @ 1.80 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD EPYC 7702P AMD EPYC 7702P
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz
49035 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Intel Celeron 430 Intel Celeron 430
1C 1T @ 1.80 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD EPYC 7702P AMD EPYC 7702P
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz
1263 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Intel Celeron 430 Intel Celeron 430
1C 1T @ 1.80 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD EPYC 7702P AMD EPYC 7702P
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz
13611 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Celeron 430 Intel Celeron 430
1C 1T @ 1.80 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD EPYC 7702P AMD EPYC 7702P
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz
391 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Celeron 430 Intel Celeron 430
1C 1T @ 1.80 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD EPYC 7702P AMD EPYC 7702P
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz
18857 (100%)

Devices using this processor

Intel Celeron 430 AMD EPYC 7702P
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD EPYC 7702PAMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X AMD EPYC 7702P vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
2. AMD EPYC 7702AMD EPYC 7702P AMD EPYC 7702 vs AMD EPYC 7702P
3. AMD EPYC 7702PAMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7702P vs AMD EPYC 7662
4. AMD EPYC 7502PAMD EPYC 7702P AMD EPYC 7502P vs AMD EPYC 7702P
5. Intel Xeon Gold 6238RAMD EPYC 7702P Intel Xeon Gold 6238R vs AMD EPYC 7702P
6. AMD EPYC 7742AMD EPYC 7702P AMD EPYC 7742 vs AMD EPYC 7702P
7. AMD EPYC 7702PAMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X AMD EPYC 7702P vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
8. AMD Ryzen 9 3950XAMD EPYC 7702P AMD Ryzen 9 3950X vs AMD EPYC 7702P
9. Intel Xeon Platinum 8276MAMD EPYC 7702P Intel Xeon Platinum 8276M vs AMD EPYC 7702P
10. AMD EPYC 7713PAMD EPYC 7702P AMD EPYC 7713P vs AMD EPYC 7702P


back to index