Intel Celeron 3965U | AMD EPYC 7F52 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Celeron 3965U or AMD EPYC 7F52 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Celeron 3965U has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.20 GHz. Up to 32 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron 3965U was released in Q1/2017. The AMD EPYC 7F52 has 16 cores with 32 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.90 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7F52 was released in Q2/2020. |
||
Intel Celeron (165) | Family | AMD EPYC (129) |
Intel Celeron 3000 (10) | CPU group | AMD EPYC 7002 (24) |
7 | Generation | 2 |
Kaby Lake U | Architecture | Rome (Zen 2) |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
-- | Predecessor | -- |
-- | Successor | -- |
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Celeron 3965U is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.20 GHz. The AMD EPYC 7F52 has 16 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 3.50 GHz (3.90 GHz). |
||
Intel Celeron 3965U | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7F52 |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
normal | Core architecture | normal |
No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
No | Overclocking ? | No |
2.20 GHz | Frequency | 3.50 GHz |
-- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.90 GHz |
-- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.70 GHz |
Internal GraphicsThe integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
Intel HD Graphics 610 | GPU | no iGPU |
0.30 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
0.90 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
9.5 | GPU Generation | -- |
14 nm | Technology | |
3 | Max. displays | |
12 | Compute units | -- |
96 | Shader | -- |
No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
No | Frame Generation | No |
32 GB | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
12 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
Intel HD Graphics 610 | GPU | no iGPU |
Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | No |
Decode / Encode | Codec VP9 | No |
Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | No |
No | Codec AV1 | No |
Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | No |
Decode | Codec VC-1 | No |
Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Celeron 3965U supports a maximum of 32 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7F52 can connect up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. |
||
Intel Celeron 3965U | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7F52 |
LPDDR3-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600 | Memory | DDR4-3200 |
32 GB | Max. Memory | |
2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 8 (Octa Channel) |
34.1 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s |
No | ECC | Yes |
-- | L2 Cache | -- |
2.00 MB | L3 Cache | 256.00 MB |
2.0 | PCIe version | 4.0 |
10 | PCIe lanes | 128 |
5.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 252.0 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Celeron 3965U has a TDP of 15 W, that of the AMD EPYC 7F52 is 240 W. |
||
Intel Celeron 3965U | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7F52 |
15 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 240 W |
-- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
-- | TDP up | -- |
10 W | TDP down | -- |
100 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Celeron 3965U has a 2.00 MB cache, while the AMD EPYC 7F52 cache has a total of 256.00 MB. |
||
Intel Celeron 3965U | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7F52 |
14 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
BGA 1356 | Socket | SP3 |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
Q1/2017 | Release date | Q2/2020 |
107 $ | Release price | 3100 $ |
show more data | show more data | |
Intel Celeron 3965U
2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.90 GHz |
Intel Celeron 3965U
2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.70 GHz |
Intel Celeron 3965U
2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.70 GHz |
Intel Celeron 3965U
2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.90 GHz |
Intel Celeron 3965U
2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.70 GHz |
Intel Celeron 3965U
2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.90 GHz |
Intel Celeron 3965U
Intel HD Graphics 610 @ 0.90 GHz |
|||
AMD EPYC 7F52
@ 0.00 GHz |
Intel Celeron 3965U
2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.90 GHz |
Intel Celeron 3965U
2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz |
|||
AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.70 GHz |
Devices using this processor |
|
Intel Celeron 3965U | AMD EPYC 7F52 |
Unknown | Unknown |