Intel Celeron 3865U vs Intel Celeron 3867U

The Intel Celeron 3865U was released in the first quarter of 2017 and is aimed at budget-conscious users of compact notebooks.

This processor is based on the Kaby Lake U architecture and is manufactured using the 14-nanometer process. With two computing cores and two threads, it provides a foundation for simple office work. In synthetic measurements, the Intel Celeron 3865U shows constant computing performance, with results being almost identical to other models in this series.

Since the differences in the benchmarks are under ten percent, no noticeable speed advantage can be determined in everyday use. The memory bandwidth of 15 GB/s and the L3 cache of 2 MB support efficiency under moderate loads. In terms of graphical performance, the Intel Celeron 3865U uses the Intel HD Graphics 610.

This integrated solution is suitable for media playback, but does not offer sufficient capacity for games. The thermal design power is set low, which enables easy cooling. The Intel Celeron 3867U appeared in early 2019 as a slightly updated version within the Kaby Lake U family.

It also targets the market for entry-level laptops and cost-effective systems. Manufacturing takes place in the 14-nanometer process with a configuration of two cores and two threads. When analyzing the computing performance, it is found that the Intel Celeron 3867U achieves identical results in common benchmarks as the Intel Celeron 3865U.

Since the performance difference is below the ten percent mark, both processors operate at the same level. The technical equipment includes an L3 cache of 2 MB and a maximum memory bandwidth of 15 GB/s, which is sufficient for office users. The Intel Celeron 3867U is hardly suitable for games due to the integrated Intel HD Graphics 610, as the graphical performance is limited for demanding titles.

The focus is on energy efficiency and low thermal load due to the low TDP. The price-performance ratio is stable, as the processor is often built into inexpensive complete systems. A recommendation is primarily based on the availability of the respective end device.