Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Celeron 1020M vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Intel Celeron 1020M
10 %
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1)
MediaTek Dimensity 8050
100 %
ARM Mali-G77 MP9
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 1020M | MediaTek Dimensity 8050 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Celeron (165) | Mediatek Dimensity (38) |
| CPU group | Intel Celeron 1000 (9) | MediaTek Dimensity 8000 (4) |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge U | Cortex-A78 / Cortex-A55 |
| Technology | 22 nm | 5 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | PGA 988 | |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 1020M | MediaTek Dimensity 8050 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 8 / 8 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 2x 2.10 GHz |
1x Cortex-A78 3.00 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 4x Cortex-A78 2.60 GHz |
|
| Core Cluster 3: | 4x Cortex-A55 2.00 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 2.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 1020M | MediaTek Dimensity 8050 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) | ARM Mali-G77 MP9 |
| GPU frequency | 0.65 - 1.00 GHz | 0.85 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 6 / 48 | 9 / 144 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | 1 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Technology | 22 nm | 7 nm |
| Release date | Q4/2012 | Q2/2019 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 1020M | MediaTek Dimensity 8050 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 1020M | MediaTek Dimensity 8050 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3L-1600 (25.6 GB/s) DDR3-1600 (25.6 GB/s) | LPDDR4X-4266 (34.1 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 16 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 8.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 1020M | MediaTek Dimensity 8050 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 1020M | MediaTek Dimensity 8050 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Android |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | |
| Release date | Q1/2013 | Q2/2023 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Celeron 1020M is 0 stars (0 ratings), while MediaTek Dimensity 8050 has received 4.9 stars (9 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
3
MediaTek Dimensity 8050
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
4
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
7
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
8
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
9
Intel Celeron 1020M
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
