Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Celeron 1020M vs Intel Celeron J6412
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Intel Celeron 1020M
47 %
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1)
Intel Celeron J6412
100 %
Intel UHD Graphics 16 EUs (Elkhart Lake)
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 1020M | Intel Celeron J6412 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Celeron (165) | Intel Celeron (165) |
| CPU group | Intel Celeron 1000 (9) | Intel Celeron J6000/N6000 (4) |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge U | Elkhart Lake |
| Technology | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Notebook |
| Socket | PGA 988 | BGA 1493 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 1020M | Intel Celeron J6412 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x | 4x |
| Frequency: | 2.10 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 2.60 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.40 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | 1.50 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 2.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 1020M | Intel Celeron J6412 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) | Intel UHD Graphics 16 EUs (Elkhart Lake) |
| GPU frequency | 0.65 - 1.00 GHz | 0.40 - 0.80 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 6 / 48 | 16 / 128 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Technology | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Release date | Q4/2012 | Q1/2021 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 1020M | Intel Celeron J6412 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 1020M | Intel Celeron J6412 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3L-1600 (25.6 GB/s) DDR3-1600 (25.6 GB/s) | LPDDR4X-3733 (59.7 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (51.2 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 16 | 3.0 x 8 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 8.0 GB/s | 7.9 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 1020M | Intel Celeron J6412 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35 W | 10 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 105 °C | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 1020M | Intel Celeron J6412 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 |
| Release date | Q1/2013 | Q1/2021 |
| Release price | 64 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Celeron 1020M is 0 stars (0 ratings), while Intel Celeron J6412 has received 4.5 stars (17 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M4 (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 4.46 GHz
7
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
8
Intel Celeron J6412
4C / 4T · 2.60 GHz
9
Intel Celeron 1020M
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
