Intel Celeron 1020M vs AMD EPYC 9445
Last updated:
 |
Note: The information shown below is based on a pre-sample. Technical details or benchmark results may be different in the final version of this processor. |
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Celeron 1020M | AMD EPYC 9445 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Celeron 1020M or AMD EPYC 9445 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Celeron 1020M has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.10 GHz. Up to 32 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron 1020M was released in Q1/2013. The AMD EPYC 9445 has 48 cores with 96 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.00 GHz. The CPU supports up to 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 9445 was released in Q4/2024. |
||
| Intel Celeron (165) | Family | AMD EPYC (129) |
| Intel Celeron 1000 (9) | CPU group | AMD EPYC 9005 (21) |
| 3 | Generation | 5 |
| Ivy Bridge U | Architecture | Turin (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Celeron 1020M is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.10 GHz. The AMD EPYC 9445 has 48 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 3.00 GHz. |
||
| Intel Celeron 1020M | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9445 |
| 2 | Cores | 48 |
| 2 | Threads | 96 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.10 GHz | Frequency | 3.00 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Internal GraphicsThe integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) | GPU | no iGPU |
| 0.65 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
| 1.00 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| 7 | GPU Generation | -- |
| 22 nm | Technology | |
| 3 | Max. displays | |
| 6 | Compute units | -- |
| 48 | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 2 GB | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 11.0 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) | GPU | no iGPU |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | No |
| Decode | Codec VC-1 | No |
| Decode | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Celeron 1020M supports a maximum of 32 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 9445 can connect up to 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels. |
||
| Intel Celeron 1020M | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9445 |
| DDR3L-1600, DDR3-1600 | Memory | DDR5-6000 |
| 32 GB | Max. Memory | 6144 GB |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 12 |
| 25.6 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 480.0 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 2.00 MB | L3 Cache | 192.00 MB |
| 2.0 | PCIe version | 5.0 |
| 16 | PCIe lanes | 128 |
| 8.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 504.1 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Celeron 1020M has a TDP of 35 W, that of the AMD EPYC 9445 is 300 W. |
||
| Intel Celeron 1020M | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9445 |
| 35 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 300 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| 105 °C | Tjunction max. | 100 °C |
Technical detailsThe Intel Celeron 1020M has a 2.00 MB cache, while the AMD EPYC 9445 cache has a total of 192.00 MB. |
||
| Intel Celeron 1020M | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9445 |
| 22 nm | Technology | 4 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | ISA extensions | SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI |
| PGA 988 | Socket | SP5 |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 |
| Q1/2013 | Release date | Q4/2024 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
2C 2T @ 2.10 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
48C 96T @ 3.00 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
Intel Celeron 1020M
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) @ 1.00 GHz |
||
|
AMD EPYC 9445
@ 0.00 GHzNot verified |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Celeron 1020M
2C 2T @ 2.10 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9445
48C 96T @ 3.00 GHzNot verified |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Celeron 1020M | AMD EPYC 9445 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
