Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Atom Z3770 vs Intel Celeron N3450
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Intel Atom Z3770
32 %
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
Intel Celeron N3450
100 %
Intel HD Graphics 500
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU
383 entries
383 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom Z3770 | Intel Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Atom (108) | Intel Celeron (165) |
| CPU group | Intel Atom Z3700 (16) | Intel Celeron J3000/N3000 (10) |
| Architecture | Bay Trail | Braswell |
| Technology | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Notebook |
| Socket | BGA 1380 | BGA 1296 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom Z3770 | Intel Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 4x | 4x |
| Frequency: | 1.46 GHz | 1.10 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 2.39 GHz | 2.20 GHz |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.20 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 2.00 MB | 2.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom Z3770 | Intel Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) | Intel HD Graphics 500 |
| GPU frequency | 0.31 - 0.67 GHz | 0.20 - 0.70 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 4 / 32 | 12 / 96 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Technology | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Release date | Q3/2013 | Q3/2016 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom Z3770 | Intel Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom Z3770 | Intel Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR3-1066 (17.1 GB/s) | LPDDR4-2400 (29.9 GB/s) LPDDR3-1866 (29.9 GB/s) DDR3L-1866 (29.9 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 6 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 3.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom Z3770 | Intel Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 3.5 W | 6 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | 4 W | |
| T. junction max. | 90 °C | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom Z3770 | Intel Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 |
| Release date | Q3/2013 | Q3/2016 |
| Release price | 107 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Atom Z3770 is 1.0 stars (1 ratings), while Intel Celeron N3450 has received 3.7 stars (14 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M4 (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 4.46 GHz
7
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
8
Intel Celeron N3450
4C / 4T · 2.20 GHz
9
Intel Atom Z3770
4C / 4T · 2.39 GHz
Popular Comparisons
