Intel Atom x5-E8000 vs MediaTek MT6595M

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Atom x5-E8000 CPU1 vs CPU2 MediaTek MT6595M
Intel Atom x5-E8000 MediaTek MT6595M

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the Intel Atom x5-E8000 and the MediaTek MT6595M and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the Intel Atom x5-E8000 4 core processor released in Q1/2016 with the MediaTek MT6595M which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q1/2014.
Intel Atom (108) Family Mediatek MT-Serie (72)
Intel Atom x3/x5/x7 (9) CPU group MediaTek MT65xx A17/A7 (2)
5 Generation 1
Cherry Trail Architecture Cortex-A9
Mobile Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Intel Atom x5-E8000 is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.04 GHz (2.00 GHz). The processor can compute 4 threads at the same time. The MediaTek MT6595M clocks with 2.00 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel.

Intel Atom x5-E8000 Characteristic MediaTek MT6595M
4 Cores 8
4 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
1.04 GHz (2.00 GHz) A-Core 2.00 GHz
4x Cortex-A17
-- B-Core 1.50 GHz
4x Cortex-A7

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

Intel Atom x5-E8000 Characteristic MediaTek MT6595M
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

Intel HD Graphics 400 GPU PowerVR G6200
0.32 GHz GPU frequency 0.45 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) 0.45 GHz
8 GPU Generation --
14 nm Technology 28 nm
3 Max. displays 2
12 Compute units 2
96 Shader 32
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
8 GB Max. GPU Memory --
12 DirectX Version 10

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Intel HD Graphics 400 GPU PowerVR G6200
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 No
No Codec VP9 No
Decode Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC No
Decode Codec VC-1 No
Decode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

Up to 8 GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the Intel Atom x5-E8000, while the MediaTek MT6595M supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s enabled.

Intel Atom x5-E8000 Characteristic MediaTek MT6595M
DDR3L-1600 Memory LPDDR3-933
8 GB Max. Memory
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
25.6 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 14.9 GB/s
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache 2.00 MB
2.00 MB L3 Cache --
2.0 PCIe version --
4 PCIe lanes --
2.0 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The Intel Atom x5-E8000 has a TDP of 5 W. The TDP of the MediaTek MT6595M is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

Intel Atom x5-E8000 Characteristic MediaTek MT6595M
5 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
90 °C Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Intel Atom x5-E8000 has 2.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 14 nm. The cache of MediaTek MT6595M is at 2.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 28 nm.

Intel Atom x5-E8000 Characteristic MediaTek MT6595M
14 nm Technology 28 nm
Monolithic Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv7-A (32 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2 ISA extensions --
BGA 1170 Socket --
VT-x, VT-x EPT Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Operating systems Android
Q1/2016 Release date Q1/2014
39 $ Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Intel Atom x5-E8000 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the MediaTek MT6595M to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Intel Atom x5-E8000 (100%)
MediaTek MT6595M (52%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Intel Atom x5-E8000 (100%)
MediaTek MT6595M (48%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Atom x5-E8000 Intel Atom x5-E8000
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz
198 (100%)
MediaTek MT6595M MediaTek MT6595M
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
103 (52%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Atom x5-E8000 Intel Atom x5-E8000
4C 4T @ 1.04 GHz
689 (100%)
MediaTek MT6595M MediaTek MT6595M
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
334 (48%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Intel Atom x5-E8000 Intel Atom x5-E8000
Intel HD Graphics 400 @ 0.32 GHz
67 (100%)
MediaTek MT6595M MediaTek MT6595M
PowerVR G6200 @ 0.45 GHz
58 (86%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Atom x5-E8000 Intel Atom x5-E8000
4C 4T @ 1.04 GHz
1008 (100%)
MediaTek MT6595M MediaTek MT6595M
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Atom x5-E8000 Intel Atom x5-E8000
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz
27 (100%)
MediaTek MT6595M MediaTek MT6595M
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Atom x5-E8000 Intel Atom x5-E8000
4C 4T @ 1.04 GHz
89 (100%)
MediaTek MT6595M MediaTek MT6595M
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

Intel Atom x5-E8000 MediaTek MT6595M
Acer NX.EFAET.050 Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Intel Atom x5-E8000Intel Celeron N4000 Intel Atom x5-E8000 vs Intel Celeron N4000
2. Intel Celeron N4100Intel Atom x5-E8000 Intel Celeron N4100 vs Intel Atom x5-E8000
3. Intel Atom x5-E8000Intel Celeron N3350 Intel Atom x5-E8000 vs Intel Celeron N3350
4. Intel Celeron N4020Intel Atom x5-E8000 Intel Celeron N4020 vs Intel Atom x5-E8000
5. Intel Atom x5-E8000Intel Celeron N3060 Intel Atom x5-E8000 vs Intel Celeron N3060
6. Intel Atom x5-E8000Intel Atom x5-Z8350 Intel Atom x5-E8000 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8350
7. Intel Celeron J3455Intel Atom x5-E8000 Intel Celeron J3455 vs Intel Atom x5-E8000
8. Intel Celeron N4120Intel Atom x5-E8000 Intel Celeron N4120 vs Intel Atom x5-E8000
9. Intel Pentium Silver N5000Intel Atom x5-E8000 Intel Pentium Silver N5000 vs Intel Atom x5-E8000
10. Intel Celeron N3050Intel Atom x5-E8000 Intel Celeron N3050 vs Intel Atom x5-E8000


back to index