HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Samsung Exynos 5800

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G CPU1 vs CPU2 Samsung Exynos 5800
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G Samsung Exynos 5800

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G and the Samsung Exynos 5800 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G 8 core processor released in Q2/2020 with the Samsung Exynos 5800 which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q2/2014.
HiSilicon Kirin (29) Family Samsung Exynos (47)
HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2) CPU group Samsung Exynos 5260/5410/5420/5422/5800 (5)
7 Generation 3
Cortex-A76 / Cortex-A55 Architecture Cortex-A15 / Cortex-A7
Mobile Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.58 GHz. The processor can compute 8 threads at the same time. The Samsung Exynos 5800 clocks with 2.00 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel.

HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G Characteristic Samsung Exynos 5800
8 Cores 8
8 Threads 8
hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.58 GHz
1x Cortex-A76
A-Core 2.00 GHz
4x Cortex-A15
2.40 GHz
3x Cortex-A76
B-Core 1.30 GHz
4x Cortex-A7
1.84 GHz
4x Cortex-A55
C-Core --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G Characteristic Samsung Exynos 5800
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

ARM Mali-G77 MP8 GPU ARM Mali-T628 MP6
0.80 GHz GPU frequency 0.60 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) 0.60 GHz
Vallhall 1 GPU Generation Midgard 2
7 nm Technology 32nm
1 Max. displays 1
8 Compute units 6
128 Shader 96
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
4 GB Max. GPU Memory --
12 DirectX Version 11

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

ARM Mali-G77 MP8 GPU ARM Mali-T628 MP6
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
Decode Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC No
Decode / Encode Codec VC-1 No
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

Up to GB of memory in a maximum of 4 memory channels is supported by the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G, while the Samsung Exynos 5800 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled.

HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G Characteristic Samsung Exynos 5800
LPDDR4X-2133 Memory LPDDR3-933
Max. Memory
4 (Quad Channel) Memory channels 0
-- Max. Bandwidth --
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache --
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G has a TDP of --. The TDP of the Samsung Exynos 5800 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G Characteristic Samsung Exynos 5800
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G has 0.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 7 nm. The cache of Samsung Exynos 5800 is at 0.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 28 nm.

HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G Characteristic Samsung Exynos 5800
7 nm Technology 28 nm
Chiplet Chip design Unknown
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv7-A (32 bit)
-- ISA extensions --
-- Socket --
None Virtualization None
No AES-NI No
Android Operating systems Android
Q2/2020 Release date Q2/2014
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 5800 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
ARM Mali-G77 MP8 @ 0.80 GHz
819 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 5800 Samsung Exynos 5800
ARM Mali-T628 MP6 @ 0.60 GHz
115 (14%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
8C 8T @ 2.58 GHz
684 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 5800 Samsung Exynos 5800
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
8C 8T @ 2.58 GHz
2517 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 5800 Samsung Exynos 5800
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
8C 8T @ 2.58 GHz
406830 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 5800 Samsung Exynos 5800
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G Samsung Exynos 5800
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 865HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
2. HiSilicon Kirin 985 5GHiSilicon Kirin 980 HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
3. HiSilicon Kirin 985 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 888 HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
4. Samsung Exynos 5800AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Samsung Exynos 5800 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
5. HiSilicon Kirin 985 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 865+ HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+
6. AMD Ryzen 9 5900XSamsung Exynos 5800 AMD Ryzen 9 5900X vs Samsung Exynos 5800
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 850Samsung Exynos 5800 Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 vs Samsung Exynos 5800
8. AMD Ryzen 7 3800XSamsung Exynos 5800 AMD Ryzen 7 3800X vs Samsung Exynos 5800
9. Samsung Exynos 5800Intel Core i7-6800K Samsung Exynos 5800 vs Intel Core i7-6800K
10. Intel Celeron N4020Samsung Exynos 5800 Intel Celeron N4020 vs Samsung Exynos 5800


back to index