HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Samsung Exynos 7580
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| HiSilicon Kirin 970 | Samsung Exynos 7580 | |
CPU comparisonHiSilicon Kirin 970 or Samsung Exynos 7580 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The HiSilicon Kirin 970 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.40 GHz. Up to 8 GB of memory is supported in 4 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 970 was released in Q3/2017. The Samsung Exynos 7580 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.60 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 7580 was released in Q2/2015. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin (29) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 7578/7580 (2) |
| 6 | Generation | 1 |
| Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53 | Architecture | Cortex-A53 |
| Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe HiSilicon Kirin 970 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.40 GHz. The Samsung Exynos 7580 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 1.60 GHz. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 970 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7580 |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.40 GHz 4x Cortex-A73 |
A-Core | 1.60 GHz 8x Cortex-A53 |
| 1.84 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
B-Core | -- |
Internal GraphicsThe integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| ARM Mali-G72 MP12 | GPU | ARM Mali-T720 MP2 |
| 0.75 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.65 GHz |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 0.65 GHz |
| Bifrost 2 | GPU Generation | Midgard 3 |
| 16 nm | Technology | 28nm |
| 1 | Max. displays | 2 |
| 12 | Compute units | 2 |
| 192 | Shader | 32 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 2 GB | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 11 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| ARM Mali-G72 MP12 | GPU | ARM Mali-T720 MP2 |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP9 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VC-1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe HiSilicon Kirin 970 supports a maximum of 8 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 7580 can connect up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 970 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7580 |
| LPDDR4X-2133 | Memory | LPDDR3-933 |
| 8 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 4 (Quad Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| -- | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| No | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | 2.00 MB |
| 2.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The HiSilicon Kirin 970 has a TDP of 9 W, that of the Samsung Exynos 7580 is --. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 970 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7580 |
| 9 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe HiSilicon Kirin 970 has a 2.00 MB cache, while the Samsung Exynos 7580 cache has a total of 2.00 MB. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 970 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7580 |
| 10 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Unknown |
| Armv8-A (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | -- |
| -- | Socket | -- |
| None | Virtualization | None |
| No | AES-NI | No |
| Android | Operating systems | Android |
| Q3/2017 | Release date | Q2/2015 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
8C 8T @ 2.40 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
HiSilicon Kirin 970
8C 8T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 7580
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 970
8C 8T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7580
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 970
ARM Mali-G72 MP12 @ 0.75 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7580
ARM Mali-T720 MP2 @ 0.65 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 970
8C 8T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7580
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| HiSilicon Kirin 970 | Samsung Exynos 7580 |
| Huawei Honor 10 Huawei Note 10 Huawei Play Huawei Honor View 10 Huawei Mate 10 Pro Huawei P20 Huawei Nova 3 Huawei Nova 4 |
Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
