Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs Intel Processor N50
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
HiSilicon Kirin 950
64 %
ARM Mali-T880 MP4
Intel Processor N50
100 %
Intel UHD Graphics 13th Gen (16 EU)
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
HiSilicon Kirin 950 | Intel Processor N50 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | HiSilicon Kirin (29) | Intel Processor N (9) |
| CPU group | HiSilicon Kirin 950 (2) | Intel Processor N50/N100/N200 (5) |
| Architecture | Cortex-A72 / Cortex-A53 | Alder Lake N |
| Technology | 16 nm | 10 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Notebook |
| Socket | BGA | |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
HiSilicon Kirin 950 | Intel Processor N50 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 2 / 2 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | normal |
| Core Cluster 1: | 4x Cortex-A72 2.30 GHz |
2x Gracemont 1.80 - 3.40 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 4x Cortex-A53 1.80 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 2.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 6.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
HiSilicon Kirin 950 | Intel Processor N50 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | ARM Mali-T880 MP4 | Intel UHD Graphics 13th Gen (16 EU) |
| GPU frequency | 0.90 - 0.90 GHz | 0.25 - 0.75 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 4 / 64 | 16 / 128 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 64 GB | |
| Technology | 16 nm | 10 nm |
| Release date | Q2/2016 | Q1/2023 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
HiSilicon Kirin 950 | Intel Processor N50 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
HiSilicon Kirin 950 | Intel Processor N50 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR4 | LPDDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (25.6 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | |
| Memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 9 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 8.9 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
HiSilicon Kirin 950 | Intel Processor N50 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 6 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
HiSilicon Kirin 950 | Intel Processor N50 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Android | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux |
| Instruction set | Armv8-A (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2 | |
| Release date | Q4/2015 | Q1/2023 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of HiSilicon Kirin 950 is 5.0 stars (4 ratings), while Intel Processor N50 has received 3.4 stars (8 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
HiSilicon Kirin 950
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
6
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
7
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
8
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
9
Intel Processor N50
2C / 2T · 3.40 GHz
Popular Comparisons
