Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
HiSilicon Kirin 925 vs Google Tensor G2
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
HiSilicon Kirin 925
11 %
ARM Mali-T628 MP4
Google Tensor G2
100 %
ARM Mali-G710 MP7
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925 | Google Tensor G2 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | HiSilicon Kirin (29) | Google Tensor (5) |
| CPU group | HiSilicon Kirin 920 (3) | Google Tensor G2 (1) |
| Architecture | Cortex-A15 / Cortex-A7 | G2 |
| Technology | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | ||
| Predecessor | Google Tensor | |
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925 | Google Tensor G2 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 8 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 4x Cortex-A15 1.80 GHz |
2x Cortex-X1 2.85 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 4x Cortex-A7 1.30 GHz |
2x Cortex-A78 2.35 GHz |
| Core Cluster 3: | 4x Cortex-A55 1.80 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 8.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 4.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925 | Google Tensor G2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | ARM Mali-T628 MP4 | ARM Mali-G710 MP7 |
| GPU frequency | 0.60 - 0.60 GHz | 0.90 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 4 / 64 | 7 / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 1 | 1 |
| Max. GPU Memory | ||
| Technology | 32nm | 4 nm |
| Release date | Q4/2012 | Q2/2021 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925 | Google Tensor G2 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Google Tensor AI | |
| AI specifications | Google Edge TPU @ 4 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925 | Google Tensor G2 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR3-1600 | LPDDR5-5500 (53.0 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 12 GB | |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | ||
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925 | Google Tensor G2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925 | Google Tensor G2 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Android | Android |
| Instruction set | Armv7-A (32 bit) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | ||
| Release date | Q3/2014 | Q4/2022 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of HiSilicon Kirin 925 is 5.0 stars (1 ratings), while Google Tensor G2 has received 4.0 stars (86 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
HiSilicon Kirin 925
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
2
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
3
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
6
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
7
Apple A15 Bionic (4-GPU)
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
9
Google Tensor G2
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
