HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs Intel Celeron N2820

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


HiSilicon Kirin 658 CPU1 vs CPU2 Intel Celeron N2820
HiSilicon Kirin 658 Intel Celeron N2820

CPU comparison

HiSilicon Kirin 658 or Intel Celeron N2820 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The HiSilicon Kirin 658 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.35 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 658 was released in Q2/2016.

The Intel Celeron N2820 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.39 GHz. The CPU supports up to 8 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron N2820 was released in Q4/2013.
HiSilicon Kirin (29) Family Intel Celeron (165)
HiSilicon Kirin 650 (4) CPU group Intel Celeron J1000/N2000 (17)
4 Generation 6
Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53 Architecture Bay Trail
Mobile Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The HiSilicon Kirin 658 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.35 GHz. The Intel Celeron N2820 has 2 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz).
HiSilicon Kirin 658 Characteristic Intel Celeron N2820
8 Cores 2
8 Threads 2
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.35 GHz
4x Cortex-A53		 A-Core 2.13 GHz (2.39 GHz)
1.70 GHz
4x Cortex-A53		 B-Core --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 Characteristic Intel Celeron N2820
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.
ARM Mali-T830 MP2 GPU Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
0.90 GHz GPU frequency 0.31 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) 0.76 GHz
Midgard 4 GPU Generation 7
28nm Technology 22 nm
2 Max. displays 2
2 Compute units 4
32 Shader 32
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory 2 GB
11 DirectX Version 11.2

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
ARM Mali-T830 MP2 GPU Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
Decode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC Decode / Encode
No Codec VC-1 Decode
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG Decode

Memory & PCIe

The HiSilicon Kirin 658 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron N2820 can connect up to 8 GB of memory in 2 memory channels.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 Characteristic Intel Celeron N2820
LPDDR3-933 Memory DDR3-1066
Max. Memory 8 GB
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
-- Max. Bandwidth 17.1 GB/s
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache 1.00 MB
-- PCIe version 2.0
-- PCIe lanes 4
-- PCIe Bandwidth 2.0 GB/s

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The HiSilicon Kirin 658 has a TDP of --, that of the Intel Celeron N2820 is 7.5 W.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 Characteristic Intel Celeron N2820
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 7.5 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down 4.5 W
-- Tjunction max. 105 °C

Technical details

The HiSilicon Kirin 658 has a 0.00 MB cache, while the Intel Celeron N2820 cache has a total of 1.00 MB.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 Characteristic Intel Celeron N2820
16 nm Technology 22 nm
Chiplet Chip design Monolithic
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2
-- Socket BGA 1170
None Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT
No AES-NI No
Android Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q2/2016 Release date Q4/2013
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the HiSilicon Kirin 658 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Intel Celeron N2820 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
HiSilicon Kirin 658 (80%)
Intel Celeron N2820 (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
HiSilicon Kirin 658 (100%)
Intel Celeron N2820 (52%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz
183 (80%)
Intel Celeron N2820 Intel Celeron N2820
2C 2T @ 2.39 GHz
229 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz
815 (100%)
Intel Celeron N2820 Intel Celeron N2820
2C 2T @ 2.39 GHz
422 (52%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
ARM Mali-T830 MP2 @ 0.90 GHz
61 (100%)
Intel Celeron N2820 Intel Celeron N2820
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) @ 0.76 GHz
48 (79%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron N2820 Intel Celeron N2820
2C 2T @ 2.39 GHz
185 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron N2820 Intel Celeron N2820
2C 2T @ 2.39 GHz
312 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron N2820 Intel Celeron N2820
2C 2T @ 2.39 GHz
78 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron N2820 Intel Celeron N2820
2C 2T @ 2.39 GHz
141 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron N2820 Intel Celeron N2820
2C 2T @ 2.39 GHz
512 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron N2820 Intel Celeron N2820
2C 2T @ 2.39 GHz
37 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron N2820 Intel Celeron N2820
2C 2T @ 2.39 GHz
73 (100%)

Devices using this processor
HiSilicon Kirin 658 Intel Celeron N2820
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Intel Celeron N2820Intel Core i3-4010U Intel Celeron N2820 vs Intel Core i3-4010U
2. Intel Celeron J1900Intel Celeron N2820 Intel Celeron J1900 vs Intel Celeron N2820
3. Intel Celeron N3050Intel Celeron N2820 Intel Celeron N3050 vs Intel Celeron N2820
4. Intel Celeron N2820Intel Celeron 1007U Intel Celeron N2820 vs Intel Celeron 1007U
5. Intel Celeron N2820AMD A4-5000 Intel Celeron N2820 vs AMD A4-5000
6. Intel Atom Z3735FIntel Celeron N2820 Intel Atom Z3735F vs Intel Celeron N2820
7. Intel Celeron N2820Intel Celeron N2830 Intel Celeron N2820 vs Intel Celeron N2830
8. Intel Celeron N2820Intel Celeron 2955U Intel Celeron N2820 vs Intel Celeron 2955U
9. Intel Celeron N2820Intel Core i3-5010U Intel Celeron N2820 vs Intel Core i3-5010U
10. Intel Celeron N2820AMD E-350 Intel Celeron N2820 vs AMD E-350


back to index