HiSilicon Kirin 650 vs Intel Pentium E5300

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


HiSilicon Kirin 650 CPU1 vs CPU2 Intel Pentium E5300
HiSilicon Kirin 650 Intel Pentium E5300

CPU comparison

HiSilicon Kirin 650 or Intel Pentium E5300 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The HiSilicon Kirin 650 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 650 was released in Q2/2016.

The Intel Pentium E5300 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.60 GHz. The CPU supports up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Pentium E5300 was released in Q4/2008.
HiSilicon Kirin (29) Family Intel Pentium (150)
HiSilicon Kirin 650 (4) CPU group Intel Pentium E5000/E6000 (13)
4 Generation 2
Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53 Architecture Wolfdale (Penryn)
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The HiSilicon Kirin 650 has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the HiSilicon Kirin 650 is 2.00 GHz while the Intel Pentium E5300 has 2 CPU cores and 2 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Pentium E5300 is at 2.60 GHz.

HiSilicon Kirin 650 Characteristic Intel Pentium E5300
8 Cores 2
8 Threads 2
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? Yes
2.00 GHz
4x Cortex-A53
A-Core 2.60 GHz
2x Penryn
1.70 GHz
4x Cortex-A53
B-Core --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

HiSilicon Kirin 650 Characteristic Intel Pentium E5300
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The HiSilicon Kirin 650 or Intel Pentium E5300 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.

ARM Mali-T830 MP2 GPU no iGPU
0.90 GHz GPU frequency --
-- GPU (Turbo) --
Midgard 4 GPU Generation --
28nm Technology
2 Max. displays
2 Compute units --
32 Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory --
11 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

ARM Mali-T830 MP2 GPU no iGPU
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
Decode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 No
No Codec VP9 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC No
No Codec VC-1 No
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The HiSilicon Kirin 650 can use up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is --. The Intel Pentium E5300 supports up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 21.3 GB/s.

HiSilicon Kirin 650 Characteristic Intel Pentium E5300
LPDDR3-933 Memory DDR3-1333, DDR2-800
Max. Memory 16 GB
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
-- Max. Bandwidth 21.3 GB/s
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache 2.00 MB
-- L3 Cache --
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the HiSilicon Kirin 650 is --, while the Intel Pentium E5300 has a TDP of 65 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.

HiSilicon Kirin 650 Characteristic Intel Pentium E5300
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 65 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The HiSilicon Kirin 650 is manufactured in 16 nm and has 0.00 MB cache. The Intel Pentium E5300 is manufactured in 45 nm and has a 2.00 MB cache.

HiSilicon Kirin 650 Characteristic Intel Pentium E5300
16 nm Technology 45 nm
Chiplet Chip design Monolithic
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3
-- Socket LGA 775
None Virtualization VT-x
No AES-NI No
Android Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q2/2016 Release date Q4/2008
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the HiSilicon Kirin 650 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Intel Pentium E5300 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 5.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
HiSilicon Kirin 650 (45%)
Intel Pentium E5300 (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
HiSilicon Kirin 650 (100%)
Intel Pentium E5300 (84%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
HiSilicon Kirin 650 HiSilicon Kirin 650
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
163 (45%)
Intel Pentium E5300 Intel Pentium E5300
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz
359 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
HiSilicon Kirin 650 HiSilicon Kirin 650
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
763 (100%)
Intel Pentium E5300 Intel Pentium E5300
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz
642 (84%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
HiSilicon Kirin 650 HiSilicon Kirin 650
ARM Mali-T830 MP2 @ 0.90 GHz
61 (100%)
Intel Pentium E5300 Intel Pentium E5300
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
HiSilicon Kirin 650 HiSilicon Kirin 650
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Pentium E5300 Intel Pentium E5300
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz
904 (100%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
HiSilicon Kirin 650 HiSilicon Kirin 650
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Pentium E5300 Intel Pentium E5300
2C 2T @ 2.60 GHz
413 (100%)

Devices using this processor

HiSilicon Kirin 650 Intel Pentium E5300
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 720GHiSilicon Kirin 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 662HiSilicon Kirin 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
3. HiSilicon Kirin 650Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 HiSilicon Kirin 650 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617
4. HiSilicon Kirin 710HiSilicon Kirin 650 HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 205HiSilicon Kirin 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 205 vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
6. Apple M1HiSilicon Kirin 650 Apple M1 vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
7. HiSilicon Kirin 650Apple A10 Fusion HiSilicon Kirin 650 vs Apple A10 Fusion
8. Intel Pentium E5300Intel Pentium E5700 Intel Pentium E5300 vs Intel Pentium E5700
9. Intel Pentium E5300Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 Intel Pentium E5300 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
10. Intel Pentium E5300Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 Intel Pentium E5300 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600


back to index