HiSilicon Kirin 620 vs Intel Celeron 847

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


HiSilicon Kirin 620 CPU1 vs CPU2 Intel Celeron 847
HiSilicon Kirin 620 Intel Celeron 847

CPU comparison

HiSilicon Kirin 620 or Intel Celeron 847 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The HiSilicon Kirin 620 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.20 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 1 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 620 was released in Q1/2015.

The Intel Celeron 847 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.10 GHz. The CPU supports up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron 847 was released in Q2/2011.
HiSilicon Kirin (29) Family Intel Celeron (165)
HiSilicon Kirin 620 (1) CPU group Intel Celeron 800 (2)
3 Generation 2
Cortex-A53 Architecture Sandy Bridge U
Mobile Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The HiSilicon Kirin 620 has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the HiSilicon Kirin 620 is 1.20 GHz while the Intel Celeron 847 has 2 CPU cores and 2 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Celeron 847 is at 1.10 GHz.

HiSilicon Kirin 620 Characteristic Intel Celeron 847
4 Cores 2
4 Threads 2
normal Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
1.20 GHz Frequency 1.10 GHz
-- Turbo Frequency (1 Core) --
-- Turbo Frequency (All Cores) --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

HiSilicon Kirin 620 Characteristic Intel Celeron 847
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The HiSilicon Kirin 620 or Intel Celeron 847 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.

ARM Mali-450 MP4 GPU Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge GT1)
0.53 GHz GPU frequency 0.35 GHz
0.53 GHz GPU (Turbo) 0.80 GHz
Utgard GPU Generation 6
28nm Technology 32 nm
1 Max. displays 2
4 Compute units 6
64 Shader 48
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory 2 GB
0 DirectX Version 10.1

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

ARM Mali-450 MP4 GPU Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge GT1)
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC Decode / Encode
No Codec VC-1 Decode
No Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The HiSilicon Kirin 620 can use up to GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is --. The Intel Celeron 847 supports up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 21.3 GB/s.

HiSilicon Kirin 620 Characteristic Intel Celeron 847
LPDDR3 Memory DDR3-1333
Max. Memory 16 GB
1 (Single Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
-- Max. Bandwidth 21.3 GB/s
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache 2.00 MB
-- PCIe version 2.0
-- PCIe lanes 16
-- PCIe Bandwidth 8.0 GB/s

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the HiSilicon Kirin 620 is --, while the Intel Celeron 847 has a TDP of 17 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.

HiSilicon Kirin 620 Characteristic Intel Celeron 847
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 17 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. 100 °C

Technical details

The HiSilicon Kirin 620 is manufactured in 28 nm and has 0.00 MB cache. The Intel Celeron 847 is manufactured in 32 nm and has a 2.00 MB cache.

HiSilicon Kirin 620 Characteristic Intel Celeron 847
28 nm Technology 32 nm
Chiplet Chip design Monolithic
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2
-- Socket BGA 1023
None Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
No AES-NI Yes
Android Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q1/2015 Release date Q2/2011
-- Release price 134 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the HiSilicon Kirin 620 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 5.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Intel Celeron 847 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
HiSilicon Kirin 620 (44%)
Intel Celeron 847 (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
HiSilicon Kirin 620 (100%)
Intel Celeron 847 (80%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
HiSilicon Kirin 620 HiSilicon Kirin 620
4C 4T @ 1.20 GHz
102 (44%)
Intel Celeron 847 Intel Celeron 847
2C 2T @ 1.10 GHz
230 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
HiSilicon Kirin 620 HiSilicon Kirin 620
4C 4T @ 1.20 GHz
505 (100%)
Intel Celeron 847 Intel Celeron 847
2C 2T @ 1.10 GHz
405 (80%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
HiSilicon Kirin 620 HiSilicon Kirin 620
ARM Mali-450 MP4 @ 0.53 GHz
32 (41%)
Intel Celeron 847 Intel Celeron 847
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge GT1) @ 0.80 GHz
77 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
HiSilicon Kirin 620 HiSilicon Kirin 620
4C 4T @ 1.20 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron 847 Intel Celeron 847
2C 2T @ 1.10 GHz
472 (100%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
HiSilicon Kirin 620 HiSilicon Kirin 620
4C 4T @ 1.20 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron 847 Intel Celeron 847
2C 2T @ 1.10 GHz
200 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
HiSilicon Kirin 620 HiSilicon Kirin 620
4C 4T @ 1.20 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron 847 Intel Celeron 847
2C 2T @ 1.10 GHz
68 (100%)

Devices using this processor

HiSilicon Kirin 620 Intel Celeron 847
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Intel Celeron 847Intel Celeron J1800 Intel Celeron 847 vs Intel Celeron J1800
2. Intel Celeron 847Intel Celeron J1900 Intel Celeron 847 vs Intel Celeron J1900
3. Intel Celeron 847Intel Atom Z3735F Intel Celeron 847 vs Intel Atom Z3735F
4. Intel Celeron 847Intel Celeron N2807 Intel Celeron 847 vs Intel Celeron N2807
5. Intel Core i3-4010UIntel Celeron 847 Intel Core i3-4010U vs Intel Celeron 847
6. Intel Celeron 847Intel Celeron 1007U Intel Celeron 847 vs Intel Celeron 1007U
7. Intel Celeron 847Intel Celeron N2830 Intel Celeron 847 vs Intel Celeron N2830
8. Intel Celeron 847Intel Atom N2600 Intel Celeron 847 vs Intel Atom N2600
9. Intel Celeron 847Intel Celeron 3205U Intel Celeron 847 vs Intel Celeron 3205U
10. AMD A4-5300BIntel Celeron 847 AMD A4-5300B vs Intel Celeron 847


back to index