Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Google Tensor G2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
Google Tensor G2
100 %
8C / 8T · 2.85 GHz
8C / 8T · 2.40 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Google Tensor G2
100 %
8C / 8T · 2.85 GHz
8C / 8T · 2.40 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Google Tensor G2
100 %
8C / 8T · 2.85 GHz
8C / 8T · 2.40 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Google Tensor G2
100 %
8C / 8T · 2.85 GHz
8C / 8T · 2.40 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Google Tensor G2
100 %
ARM Mali-G710 MP7
Qualcomm Adreno 620
AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
Multi-core performance
Google Tensor G2
100 %
8C / 8T · 2.85 GHz
8C / 8T · 2.40 GHz
AI performance (NPU)
Google Tensor G2
73 %
8C / 8T · 2.85 GHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
100 %
8C / 8T · 2.40 GHz
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor G2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Google Tensor (5) | Qualcomm Snapdragon (105) |
| CPU group | Google Tensor G2 (1) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 760 (3) |
| Architecture | G2 | Kryo 475 |
| Technology | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | ||
| Predecessor | Google Tensor | |
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor G2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 8 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 2x Cortex-X1 2.85 GHz |
1x Kryo 475 Prime 2.40 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 2x Cortex-A78 2.35 GHz |
1x Kryo 475 Gold 2.20 GHz |
| Core Cluster 3: | 4x Cortex-A55 1.80 GHz |
6x Kryo 475 Silver 1.80 GHz |
| L2-Cache | 8.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 4.00 MB | 2.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor G2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | ARM Mali-G710 MP7 | Qualcomm Adreno 620 |
| GPU frequency | 0.90 GHz | 0.75 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 7 / | / 192 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 1 | 2 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 4 GB | |
| Technology | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Release date | Q2/2021 | Q2/2019 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor G2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Google Tensor AI | Qualcomm AI engine |
| AI specifications | Google Edge TPU @ 4 TOPS | Hexagon 696 @ 5.5 TOPS |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor G2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR5-5500 (53.0 GB/s) | LPDDR4-4266 (17.1 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | ||
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor G2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10 W | 5 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor G2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Android | Android |
| Instruction set | Armv8-A (64 bit) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | ||
| Release date | Q4/2022 | Q3/2020 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Google Tensor G2 is 4.0 stars (86 ratings), while Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G has received 4.3 stars (38 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
3
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
6
Apple A15 Bionic (4-GPU)
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
9
Google Tensor G2
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
