Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Google Tensor G2 vs HiSilicon Kirin 925
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Google Tensor G2
100 %
ARM Mali-G710 MP7
HiSilicon Kirin 925
11 %
ARM Mali-T628 MP4
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor G2 | HiSilicon Kirin 925 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Google Tensor (5) | HiSilicon Kirin (29) |
| CPU group | Google Tensor G2 (1) | HiSilicon Kirin 920 (3) |
| Architecture | G2 | Cortex-A15 / Cortex-A7 |
| Technology | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | ||
| Predecessor | Google Tensor | |
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor G2 | HiSilicon Kirin 925 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 8 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 2x Cortex-X1 2.85 GHz |
4x Cortex-A15 1.80 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 2x Cortex-A78 2.35 GHz |
4x Cortex-A7 1.30 GHz |
| Core Cluster 3: | 4x Cortex-A55 1.80 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 8.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 4.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor G2 | HiSilicon Kirin 925 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | ARM Mali-G710 MP7 | ARM Mali-T628 MP4 |
| GPU frequency | 0.90 GHz | 0.60 - 0.60 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 7 / | 4 / 64 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 1 | 1 |
| Max. GPU Memory | ||
| Technology | 4 nm | 32nm |
| Release date | Q2/2021 | Q4/2012 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor G2 | HiSilicon Kirin 925 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Google Tensor AI | |
| AI specifications | Google Edge TPU @ 4 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor G2 | HiSilicon Kirin 925 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR5-5500 (53.0 GB/s) | LPDDR3-1600 |
| Max. Memory | 12 GB | |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | ||
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor G2 | HiSilicon Kirin 925 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor G2 | HiSilicon Kirin 925 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Android | Android |
| Instruction set | Armv8-A (64 bit) | Armv7-A (32 bit) |
| ISA extensions | ||
| Release date | Q4/2022 | Q3/2014 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Google Tensor G2 is 4.0 stars (86 ratings), while HiSilicon Kirin 925 has received 5.0 stars (1 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
HiSilicon Kirin 925
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
2
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
3
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
6
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
7
Apple A15 Bionic (4-GPU)
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
8
Apple A19
6C / 6T · 4.26 GHz
9
Google Tensor G2
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
