Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Apple A13 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000+
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
Apple A13 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 2.65 GHz
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Apple A13 Bionic
85 %
6C / 6T · 2.65 GHz
MediaTek Dimensity 9000+
100 %
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Apple A13 Bionic
97 %
6C / 6T · 2.65 GHz
MediaTek Dimensity 9000+
100 %
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Apple A13 Bionic
74 %
6C / 6T · 2.65 GHz
MediaTek Dimensity 9000+
100 %
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Apple A13 Bionic
100 %
Apple A13
ARM Mali-G710 MP10
AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
Multi-core performance
Apple A13 Bionic
60 %
6C / 6T · 2.65 GHz
MediaTek Dimensity 9000+
100 %
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Apple A13 Bionic | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Apple A series (27) | Mediatek Dimensity (38) |
| CPU group | Apple A13 (1) | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (2) |
| Architecture | A13 (Lightning / Thunder) | Cortex-X2 / -A710 / -A510 |
| Technology | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | ||
| Predecessor | Apple A12 Bionic | |
| Successor | Apple A14 Bionic | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Apple A13 Bionic | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 8 / 8 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 2x Lightning 2.65 GHz |
1x Cortex-X2 3.20 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 4x Thunder 1.80 GHz |
3x Cortex-A710 2.85 GHz |
| Core Cluster 3: | 4x Cortex-A510 1.80 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 8.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | ||
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Apple A13 Bionic | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Apple A13 | ARM Mali-G710 MP10 |
| GPU frequency | 1.35 GHz | 0.90 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 16 / 256 | 10 / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 1 | 1 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 4 GB | |
| Technology | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Release date | Q3/2019 | Q2/2021 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Apple A13 Bionic | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Apple Neural Engine | |
| AI specifications | 8 Neural cores @ 6 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Apple A13 Bionic | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR4X-4266 (34.1 GB/s) | LPDDR5-7500 (60.0 GB/s) LPDDR5-6400 (51.2 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 4 GB | |
| Memory channels | 1 | 4 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | ||
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Apple A13 Bionic | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 6 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Apple A13 Bionic | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | iOS | Android |
| Instruction set | Armv8-A (64 bit) | Armv9-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | ||
| Release date | Q3/2019 | Q3/2022 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Apple A13 Bionic is 3.8 stars (183 ratings), while MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ has received 3.9 stars (7 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
6
Apple A15 Bionic (4-GPU)
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
8
MediaTek Dimensity 9000+
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
9
Apple A13 Bionic
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
