Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
190 entries
190 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Monero Hashrate
94 entries
94 entries
V-Ray CPU-Render
251 entries
251 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD Ryzen Threadripper (16) | Qualcomm Snapdragon (105) |
| CPU group | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1000 (3) | Qualcomm Snapdragon QM215 (1) |
| Architecture | Whitehaven (Zen) | Cortex-A53 |
| Technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | TR4 (SP3r2) | |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✓ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 8x | 4x Cortex-A53 |
| Frequency: | 3.80 GHz | 1.30 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 4.00 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 4.00 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | 4.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 16.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✓ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | Qualcomm Adreno 308 |
| GPU frequency | 0.50 - 0.50 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | / | / 24 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 0 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | ||
| Technology | 28 nm | |
| Release date | Q1/2016 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Qualcomm AI engine | |
| AI specifications | Hexagon | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR4-2666 (85.4 GB/s) | LPDDR3-1066 (4.3 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 3 GB | |
| Memory channels | 4 | 1 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 64 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 63.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Android |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | |
| Release date | Q3/2017 | Q3/2019 |
| Release price | 549 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 4.3 stars (7 ratings), while Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 has received 2.8 stars (6 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
3
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
4
Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
24C / 24T · 5.50 GHz
5
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
6
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
7
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
8
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
8C / 16T · 4.00 GHz
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
4C / 4T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
