AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G vs Samsung Exynos 7420 Benchmark, comparison and differences


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G		Samsung Exynos 7420
CPU comparison AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G or Samsung Exynos 7420 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G has 4 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.90 GHz. Up to 64 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G was released in Q1/2018. The Samsung Exynos 7420 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.10 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 7420 was released in Q2/2015.

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO (28)	Family	Samsung Exynos (47)
AMD Ryzen 2000G (5)	CPU group	Samsung Exynos 7420 (1)
1	Generation	1
Raven Ridge (Zen)	Architecture	Cortex-A57 / Cortex-A53
Desktop / Server	Segment	Mobile
--	Predecessor	--
--	Successor	--

CPU Cores and Base Frequency The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is 3.60 GHz (3.90 GHz) while the Samsung Exynos 7420 has 8 CPU cores and 8 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 7420 is at 2.10 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G	Characteristic	Samsung Exynos 7420
4	Cores	8
8	Threads	8
normal	Core architecture	hybrid (big.LITTLE)
Yes	Hyperthreading	No
Yes	Overclocking ?	No
3.60 GHz (3.90 GHz)	A-Core	2.10 GHz 4x Cortex-A57
--	B-Core	1.50 GHz 4x Cortex-A53
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G	Characteristic	Samsung Exynos 7420
--	AI hardware	--
--	AI specifications	--

Internal Graphics The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G or Samsung Exynos 7420 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 (Raven Ridge)	GPU	ARM Mali-T760 MP8
1.25 GHz	GPU frequency	0.70 GHz
--	GPU (Turbo)	0.77 GHz
8	GPU Generation	Midgard 3
14 nm	Technology	28nm
3	Max. displays	2
11	Compute units	8
704	Shader	128
No	Hardware Raytracing	No
No	Frame Generation	No
2 GB	Max. GPU Memory	--
12	DirectX Version	11

Hardware codec support A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 (Raven Ridge)	GPU	ARM Mali-T760 MP8
Decode / Encode	Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit)	No
Decode / Encode	Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit)	No
Decode / Encode	Codec h264	Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode	Codec VP9	No
Decode / Encode	Codec VP8	Decode / Encode
No	Codec AV1	No
Decode / Encode	Codec AVC	No
Decode	Codec VC-1	No
Decode / Encode	Codec JPEG	No

Memory & PCIe The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G can use up to 64 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 46.9 GB/s. The Samsung Exynos 7420 supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G	Characteristic	Samsung Exynos 7420
DDR4-2933	Memory	LPDDR4-1600
64 GB	Max. Memory
2 (Dual Channel)	Memory channels	0
46.9 GB/s	Max. Bandwidth	--
Yes	ECC	No
--	L2 Cache	0.51 MB
4.00 MB	L3 Cache	--
3.0	PCIe version	--
12	PCIe lanes	--
11.8 GB/s	PCIe Bandwidth	--
Thermal Management The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is 65 W, while the Samsung Exynos 7420 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G	Characteristic	Samsung Exynos 7420
65 W	TDP (PL1 / PBP)	--
--	TDP (PL2)	--
--	TDP up	--
46 W	TDP down	--
95 °C	Tjunction max.	--
Technical details The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is manufactured in 14 nm and has 4.00 MB cache. The Samsung Exynos 7420 is manufactured in 14 nm and has a 0.51 MB cache.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G	Characteristic	Samsung Exynos 7420
14 nm	Technology	14 nm
Monolithic	Chip design	Unknown
x86-64 (64 bit)	Instruction set (ISA)	Armv8-A (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3	ISA extensions	--
AM4 (PGA 1331)	Socket	--
AMD-V, SVM	Virtualization	None
Yes	AES-NI	No
Windows 10, Linux	Operating systems	Android
Q1/2018	Release date	Q2/2015
165 $	Release price	--

show more data		show more data

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G 4C 8T @ 3.60 GHz (3.90 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save! Samsung Exynos 7420 8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!

Rate these processors

Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G (100%)

Samsung Exynos 7420 (29%)

⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G (100%)

Samsung Exynos 7420 (25%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G 4C 8T @ 3.90 GHz	854 (100%)
	Samsung Exynos 7420 8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz	244 (29%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G 4C 8T @ 3.70 GHz	3174 (100%)
	Samsung Exynos 7420 8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz	945 (30%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.


	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 (Raven Ridge) @ 1.25 GHz	1760 (100%)
	Samsung Exynos 7420 ARM Mali-T760 MP8 @ 0.77 GHz	210 (12%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.


	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G 4C 8T @ 3.70 GHz	8460 (100%)
	Samsung Exynos 7420 8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz	1618 (19%)

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G 4C 8T @ 3.90 GHz	1021 (100%)
	Samsung Exynos 7420 8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz	0 (0%)

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G 4C 8T @ 3.70 GHz	4800 (100%)
	Samsung Exynos 7420 8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz	0 (0%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.


	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G 4C 8T @ 3.90 GHz	0 (0%)
	Samsung Exynos 7420 8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz	280 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.


	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G 4C 8T @ 3.70 GHz	0 (0%)
	Samsung Exynos 7420 8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz	850 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G 4C 8T @ 3.90 GHz	391 (100%)
	Samsung Exynos 7420 8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz	0 (0%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G 4C 8T @ 3.70 GHz	1922 (100%)
	Samsung Exynos 7420 8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz	0 (0%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.


	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G 4C 8T @ 3.60 GHz	0 (0%)
	Samsung Exynos 7420 8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz	112550 (100%)

Blender 3.1 Benchmark

In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.


	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G 4C 8T @ 3.70 GHz	59 (100%)
	Samsung Exynos 7420 8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz	0 (0%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.


	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G 4C 8T @ 3.60 GHz	2199 (100%)
	Samsung Exynos 7420 8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz	0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G 4C 8T @ 3.90 GHz	155 (100%)
	Samsung Exynos 7420 8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz	0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G 4C 8T @ 3.70 GHz	811 (100%)
	Samsung Exynos 7420 8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz	0 (0%)


1.		AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G vs Intel Processor N100
2.		AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
3.		AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
4.		Samsung Exynos 7420 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
5.		AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G vs Intel Core i5-9500
6.		Samsung Exynos 7884 vs Samsung Exynos 7420
7.		Samsung Exynos 7420 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
8.		AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
9.		Samsung Exynos 7420 vs Samsung Exynos 9810
10.		AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G vs Samsung Exynos 7420

CPU comparison with benchmarks

CPU comparison

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Internal Graphics

Hardware codec support

Memory & PCIe

Thermal Management

Technical details