Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U vs Intel Celeron E1200
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
100 %
2C / 4T · 3.50 GHz
Intel Celeron E1200
22 %
2C / 2T · 1.60 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
100 %
2C / 4T · 2.60 GHz
Intel Celeron E1200
18 %
2C / 2T · 1.60 GHz
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
3DMark Timespy (iGPU)
534 entries
534 entries
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
213 entries
213 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | Intel Celeron E1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD Ryzen 3 (34) | Intel Celeron (165) |
| CPU group | AMD Ryzen 3000U (Dali) (2) | Intel Celeron E1000 (4) |
| Architecture | Dali (Zen+) | Conroe (Core) |
| Technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Desktop |
| Socket | FP5 | LGA 775 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | Intel Celeron E1200 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✓ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x | 2x Core |
| Frequency: | 2.60 GHz | 1.60 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 3.50 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.60 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | 1.00 MB | 0.50 MB |
| L3-Cache | 4.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | Intel Celeron E1200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 (Raven Ridge) | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | 1.20 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | 3 / 192 | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | |
| Technology | 14 nm | |
| Release date | Q1/2018 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | Intel Celeron E1200 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | Intel Celeron E1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR4-2400 (38.4 GB/s) | DDR3-1066 (17.1 GB/s) DDR2-800 (12.8 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 12 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 11.8 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | Intel Celeron E1200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15 W | 65 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | 25 W | |
| TDP down | 12 W | |
| T. junction max. | 95 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | Intel Celeron E1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 |
| Release date | Q1/2020 | Q1/2008 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U is 3.7 stars (54 ratings), while Intel Celeron E1200 has received 3.5 stars (2 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
6
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
7
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
8
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
2C / 4T · 3.50 GHz
9
Intel Celeron E1200
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
