AMD Phenom II X4 810 vs AMD A12-9800
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD Phenom II X4 810 | AMD A12-9800 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD Phenom II X4 810 and the AMD A12-9800 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the AMD Phenom II X4 810 4 core processor released in Q1/2009 with the AMD A12-9800 which has 4 CPU cores and was introduced in Q3/2017. |
||
| AMD Phenom II (52) | Family | AMD A (112) |
| AMD Phenom II - 800/900 (23) | CPU group | AMD A12-9800 (1) |
| 4 | Generation | 7 |
| Deneb (K10) | Architecture | Excavator (Bristol Ridge) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD Phenom II X4 810 is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.60 GHz. The processor can compute 4 threads at the same time. The AMD A12-9800 clocks with 3.80 GHz (4.20 GHz), has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel. |
||
| AMD Phenom II X4 810 | Characteristic | AMD A12-9800 |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| Yes | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.60 GHz | Frequency | 3.80 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 4.20 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | AMD Radeon R7 - 512 (Bristol Ridge) |
| GPU frequency | 1.11 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | 6 |
| Technology | 28 nm | |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| -- | Compute units | 8 |
| -- | Shader | 512 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB |
| -- | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | AMD Radeon R7 - 512 (Bristol Ridge) |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | Decode |
| No | Codec VC-1 | Decode |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeUp to GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the AMD Phenom II X4 810, while the AMD A12-9800 supports a maximum of 64 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s enabled. |
||
| AMD Phenom II X4 810 | Characteristic | AMD A12-9800 |
| DDR3-1333, DDR2-1066 | Memory | DDR4-2400 |
| Max. Memory | 64 GB | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 21.3 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 38.4 GB/s |
| No | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | 2.00 MB |
| 4.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 8 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 7.9 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe AMD Phenom II X4 810 has a TDP of 95 W. The TDP of the AMD A12-9800 is 65 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| AMD Phenom II X4 810 | Characteristic | AMD A12-9800 |
| 95 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 65 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | 90 °C |
Technical detailsThe AMD Phenom II X4 810 has 4.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 45 nm. The cache of AMD A12-9800 is at 2.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 28 nm. |
||
| AMD Phenom II X4 810 | Characteristic | AMD A12-9800 |
| 45 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE3, SSE4a | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, FMA4 |
| AM3 | Socket | AM4 (PGA 1331) |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | AMD-V |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q1/2009 | Release date | Q3/2017 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
4C 4T @ 2.60 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz (4.20 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD Phenom II X4 810
4C 4T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
AMD A12-9800
4C 4T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 810
4C 4T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A12-9800
4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 810
4C 4T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A12-9800
4C 4T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 810
4C 4T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A12-9800
4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 810
4C 4T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A12-9800
4C 4T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 810
4C 4T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A12-9800
4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 810
4C 4T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A12-9800
4C 4T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 810
4C 4T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A12-9800
4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 810
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A12-9800
AMD Radeon R7 - 512 (Bristol Ridge) @ 1.11 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 810
4C 4T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A12-9800
4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD Phenom II X4 810 | AMD A12-9800 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
