AMD Phenom II X2 B53 vs AMD EPYC 7F32
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD Phenom II X2 B53 | AMD EPYC 7F32 | |
CPU comparisonAMD Phenom II X2 B53 or AMD EPYC 7F32 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD Phenom II X2 B53 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.80 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The AMD Phenom II X2 B53 was released in Q3/2009. The AMD EPYC 7F32 has 8 cores with 16 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.90 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7F32 was released in Q2/2020. |
||
| AMD Phenom II (52) | Family | AMD EPYC (129) |
| AMD Phenom II - 545 (9) | CPU group | AMD EPYC 7002 (24) |
| 2 | Generation | 2 |
| Callisto (K10) | Architecture | Rome (Zen 2) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD Phenom II X2 B53 has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD Phenom II X2 B53 is 2.80 GHz while the AMD EPYC 7F32 has 8 CPU cores and 16 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7F32 is at 3.70 GHz (3.90 GHz). |
||
| AMD Phenom II X2 B53 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7F32 |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| Yes | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.80 GHz | Frequency | 3.70 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.90 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.80 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD Phenom II X2 B53 can use up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 21.3 GB/s. The AMD EPYC 7F32 supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 51.2 GB/s. |
||
| AMD Phenom II X2 B53 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7F32 |
| DDR3-1333, DDR2-1066 | Memory | DDR4-3200 |
| Max. Memory | ||
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 8 (Octa Channel) |
| 21.3 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 6.00 MB | L3 Cache | 128.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | 4.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 128 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 252.0 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD Phenom II X2 B53 is 80 W, while the AMD EPYC 7F32 has a TDP of 180 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| AMD Phenom II X2 B53 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7F32 |
| 80 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 180 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD Phenom II X2 B53 is manufactured in 45 nm and has 6.00 MB cache. The AMD EPYC 7F32 is manufactured in 7 nm and has a 128.00 MB cache. |
||
| AMD Phenom II X2 B53 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7F32 |
| 45 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE3, SSE4a | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| AM3 | Socket | SP3 |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q3/2009 | Release date | Q2/2020 |
| -- | Release price | 2100 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
2C 2T @ 2.80 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 16T @ 3.70 GHz (3.90 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 0 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
AMD Phenom II X2 B53
2C 2T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
AMD EPYC 7F32
8C 16T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Phenom II X2 B53
2C 2T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7F32
8C 16T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Phenom II X2 B53
2C 2T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7F32
8C 16T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Phenom II X2 B53
2C 2T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7F32
8C 16T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Phenom II X2 B53
2C 2T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7F32
8C 16T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Phenom II X2 B53
2C 2T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7F32
8C 16T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD Phenom II X2 B53 | AMD EPYC 7F32 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
