|AMD FX-8320E||AMD FX-8300|
AMD FX-8320E or AMD FX-8300 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD FX-8320E has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.00 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 (Dual Channel) memory channels. The AMD FX-8320E was released in Q3/2014.
The AMD FX-8300 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.20 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 (Dual Channel) memory channels. The AMD FX-8300 was released in Q2/2013.
|AMD FX||Family||AMD FX|
|AMD FX-8000||CPU group||AMD FX-8000|
|Vishera (Bulldozer)||Architecture||Vishera (Bulldozer)|
|Desktop / Server||Segment||Desktop / Server|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In addition to the number of CPU cores and threads, you can see here whether the AMD FX-8320E or AMD FX-8300 can be overclocked. You will also find the clock frequencies of the processor (single-core and multi-core) here. The number of CPU cores greatly affects the speed of the processor.
|3.20 GHz||Frequency||3.30 GHz|
|4.00 GHz||Turbo Frequency (1 Core)||4.20 GHz|
|3.60 GHz||Turbo Frequency (All Cores)||4.00 GHz|
The AMD FX-8320E or AMD FX-8300 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. A processor with integrated graphics is also called APU (Accelerated Processing Unit).
|no iGPU||GPU||no iGPU|
|Max. GPU Memory|
Hardware codec support
A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
|No||Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit)||No|
|No||Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit)||No|
Memory & PCIe
The memory type as well as the amount of memory can greatly affect the speed of the processor. The memory bandwidth depends on several factors and is given in gigabytes per second.
|2 (Dual Channel)||Memory channels||2 (Dual Channel)|
|8.00 MB||L3 Cache||8.00 MB|
The Thermal Design Power (TDP for short) specifies the necessary cooling solution to cool the processor sufficiently. The TDP usually only gives a rough idea of the real consumption of a CPU.
|95 W||TDP (PL1 / PBP)||95 W|
Here you will find information on the size of the level 2 and level 3 cache of the AMD FX-8320E or AMD FX-8300 as well as a list of the processors ISA extensions. We have documented the architecture and the manufacturing technology for you as well as the release date.
|32 nm||Technology||32 nm|
|x86-64 (64 bit)||Instruction set (ISA)||x86-64 (64 bit)|
|SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4||ISA extensions||SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4|
|Windows 10, Linux||Operating systems||Windows 10, Linux|
|125 $||Release price||--|
|show more data||show more data|
Devices using this processor
|AMD FX-8320E||AMD FX-8300|
|1.||AMD FX-6300 vs AMD FX-8300|
|2.||AMD FX-8350 vs AMD FX-8300|
|3.||AMD FX-8320 vs AMD FX-8320E|
|4.||AMD FX-8300 vs AMD FX-8320|
|5.||Intel Core i7-4770 vs AMD FX-8300|
|6.||Intel Core i5-4460 vs AMD FX-8300|
|7.||AMD FX-6300 vs AMD FX-8320E|
|8.||AMD FX-8300 vs AMD Ryzen 3 1200|
|9.||AMD FX-8320E vs AMD FX-8300|
|10.||AMD FX-8350 vs AMD FX-8320E|
|11.||AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs AMD FX-8300|
|12.||AMD FX-8300 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600|
|13.||AMD FX-8300 vs Intel Core i3-6100|
|14.||AMD Phenom II X4 955 vs AMD FX-8300|
|15.||AMD FX-8300 vs AMD FX-6100|