AMD FX-8320 vs UNISOC T770

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD FX-8320 CPU1 vs CPU2 UNISOC T770
AMD FX-8320 UNISOC T770

CPU comparison

AMD FX-8320 or UNISOC T770 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The AMD FX-8320 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.00 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The AMD FX-8320 was released in Q4/2012.

The UNISOC T770 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.50 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The UNISOC T770 was released in Q1/2020.
AMD FX (30) Family UNISOC 5G (3)
AMD FX-8000 (11) CPU group UNISOC 5G 6nm (2)
2 Generation 0
Vishera (Bulldozer) Architecture --
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD FX-8320 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.50 GHz (4.00 GHz). The UNISOC T770 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.50 GHz.

AMD FX-8320 Characteristic UNISOC T770
8 Cores 8
8 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE)
No Hyperthreading No
Yes Overclocking ? No
3.50 GHz (4.00 GHz) A-Core 2.50 GHz
1x Cortex-A76
-- B-Core 2.20 GHz
3x Cortex-A76
-- C-Core 2.00 GHz
4x Cortex-A55

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

AMD FX-8320 Characteristic UNISOC T770
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-G57 MP4
GPU frequency 0.78 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) --
-- GPU Generation Vallhall 1
Technology 7 nm
Max. displays 2
-- Compute units 4
-- Shader 64
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory 4 GB
-- DirectX Version 12

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-G57 MP4
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 Decode
No Codec AVC Decode / Encode
No Codec VC-1 Decode / Encode
No Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

The AMD FX-8320 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The UNISOC T770 can connect up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels.

AMD FX-8320 Characteristic UNISOC T770
DDR3-1866 Memory LPDDR4X-2133,
Max. Memory
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
29.9 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
Yes ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
8.00 MB L3 Cache --
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD FX-8320 has a TDP of 125 W, that of the UNISOC T770 is --.

AMD FX-8320 Characteristic UNISOC T770
125 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The AMD FX-8320 has a 8.00 MB cache, while the UNISOC T770 cache has a total of 0.00 MB.

AMD FX-8320 Characteristic UNISOC T770
32 nm Technology 6 nm
Unknown Chip design Unknown
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 ISA extensions --
AM3+ Socket --
AMD-V Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Android
Q4/2012 Release date Q1/2020
125 $ Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD FX-8320 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 3.2 stars (5 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the UNISOC T770 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 5.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 (84%)
UNISOC T770 (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 (100%)
UNISOC T770 (89%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-8320 AMD FX-8320
8C 8T @ 4.00 GHz
522 (84%)
UNISOC T770 UNISOC T770
8C 8T @ 2.50 GHz
619 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-8320 AMD FX-8320
8C 8T @ 3.75 GHz
2489 (100%)
UNISOC T770 UNISOC T770
8C 8T @ 2.50 GHz
2207 (89%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-8320 AMD FX-8320
8C 8T @ 4.00 GHz
188 (100%)
UNISOC T770 UNISOC T770
8C 8T @ 2.50 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-8320 AMD FX-8320
8C 8T @ 3.75 GHz
1082 (100%)
UNISOC T770 UNISOC T770
8C 8T @ 2.50 GHz
0 (0%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD FX-8320 AMD FX-8320
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)
UNISOC T770 UNISOC T770
ARM Mali-G57 MP4 @ 0.78 GHz
399 (100%)

AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
AMD FX-8320 AMD FX-8320
8C 8T @ 3.50 GHz
0 (0%)
UNISOC T770 UNISOC T770
8C 8T @ 2.50 GHz
420306 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD FX-8320 AMD FX-8320
8C 8T @ 3.75 GHz
8291 (100%)
UNISOC T770 UNISOC T770
8C 8T @ 2.50 GHz
0 (0%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Single-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
AMD FX-8320 AMD FX-8320
8C 8T @ 4.00 GHz
223 (100%)
UNISOC T770 UNISOC T770
8C 8T @ 2.50 GHz
0 (0%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
AMD FX-8320 AMD FX-8320
8C 8T @ 3.50 GHz
1350 (100%)
UNISOC T770 UNISOC T770
8C 8T @ 2.50 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-8320 AMD FX-8320
8C 8T @ 4.00 GHz
91 (100%)
UNISOC T770 UNISOC T770
8C 8T @ 2.50 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-8320 AMD FX-8320
8C 8T @ 3.75 GHz
608 (100%)
UNISOC T770 UNISOC T770
8C 8T @ 2.50 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

AMD FX-8320 UNISOC T770
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD FX-8320AMD FX-8320E AMD FX-8320 vs AMD FX-8320E
2. AMD FX-8300AMD FX-8320 AMD FX-8300 vs AMD FX-8320
3. Intel Core i5-4460AMD FX-8320 Intel Core i5-4460 vs AMD FX-8320
4. AMD FX-6300AMD FX-8320 AMD FX-6300 vs AMD FX-8320
5. AMD Phenom II X4 955AMD FX-8320 AMD Phenom II X4 955 vs AMD FX-8320
6. AMD FX-8350AMD FX-8320 AMD FX-8350 vs AMD FX-8320
7. AMD Ryzen 5 2600AMD FX-8320 AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs AMD FX-8320
8. Intel Core i7-6700AMD FX-8320 Intel Core i7-6700 vs AMD FX-8320
9. Intel Core i5-4590AMD FX-8320 Intel Core i5-4590 vs AMD FX-8320
10. Intel Core i5-4440AMD FX-8320 Intel Core i5-4440 vs AMD FX-8320


back to index