AMD FX-6200 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD FX-6200 CPU1 vs CPU2 HiSilicon Kirin 970
AMD FX-6200 HiSilicon Kirin 970

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD FX-6200 and the HiSilicon Kirin 970 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the AMD FX-6200 6 core processor released in Q2/2012 with the HiSilicon Kirin 970 which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q3/2017.
AMD FX (30) Family HiSilicon Kirin (29)
AMD FX-6100/6200 (3) CPU group HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1)
1 Generation 6
Zambezi (Bulldozer) Architecture Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD FX-6200 is a 6 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.80 GHz (4.10 GHz). The processor can compute 6 threads at the same time. The HiSilicon Kirin 970 clocks with 2.40 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel.

AMD FX-6200 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 970
6 Cores 8
6 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
No Hyperthreading No
Yes Overclocking ? No
3.80 GHz (4.10 GHz) A-Core 2.40 GHz
4x Cortex-A73
-- B-Core 1.84 GHz
4x Cortex-A53

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

AMD FX-6200 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 970
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-G72 MP12
GPU frequency 0.75 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) --
-- GPU Generation Bifrost 2
Technology 16 nm
Max. displays 1
-- Compute units 12
-- Shader 192
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory 2 GB
-- DirectX Version 12

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-G72 MP12
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC Decode / Encode
No Codec VC-1 Decode / Encode
No Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

Up to GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the AMD FX-6200, while the HiSilicon Kirin 970 supports a maximum of 8 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled.

AMD FX-6200 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 970
DDR3-1866 Memory LPDDR4X-2133
Max. Memory 8 GB
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 4 (Quad Channel)
29.9 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
Yes ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
8.00 MB L3 Cache 2.00 MB
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The AMD FX-6200 has a TDP of 125 W. The TDP of the HiSilicon Kirin 970 is 9 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

AMD FX-6200 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 970
125 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 9 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The AMD FX-6200 has 8.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 32 nm. The cache of HiSilicon Kirin 970 is at 2.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 10 nm.

AMD FX-6200 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 970
32 nm Technology 10 nm
Unknown Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX ISA extensions --
AM3+ Socket --
AMD-V Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Android
Q2/2012 Release date Q3/2017
95 $ Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD FX-6200 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 5.0 stars (2 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the HiSilicon Kirin 970 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 5.0 stars (4 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 970 (67%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 970 (73%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-6200 AMD FX-6200
6C 6T @ 4.10 GHz
524 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 970 HiSilicon Kirin 970
8C 8T @ 2.40 GHz
349 (67%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-6200 AMD FX-6200
6C 6T @ 4.10 GHz
1992 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 970 HiSilicon Kirin 970
8C 8T @ 2.40 GHz
1455 (73%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-6200 AMD FX-6200
6C 6T @ 4.10 GHz
183 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 970 HiSilicon Kirin 970
8C 8T @ 2.40 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-6200 AMD FX-6200
6C 6T @ 4.10 GHz
836 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 970 HiSilicon Kirin 970
8C 8T @ 2.40 GHz
0 (0%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD FX-6200 AMD FX-6200
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 970 HiSilicon Kirin 970
ARM Mali-G72 MP12 @ 0.75 GHz
330 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD FX-6200 AMD FX-6200
6C 6T @ 4.10 GHz
6180 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 970 HiSilicon Kirin 970
8C 8T @ 2.40 GHz
0 (0%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
AMD FX-6200 AMD FX-6200
6C 6T @ 3.80 GHz
987 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 970 HiSilicon Kirin 970
8C 8T @ 2.40 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

AMD FX-6200 HiSilicon Kirin 970
Unknown Huawei Honor 10
Huawei Note 10
Huawei Play
Huawei Honor View 10
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Huawei P20
Huawei Nova 3
Huawei Nova 4

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. HiSilicon Kirin 970Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
2. HiSilicon Kirin 970Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
3. HiSilicon Kirin 970Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
4. HiSilicon Kirin 970Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 720GHiSilicon Kirin 970 Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888HiSilicon Kirin 970 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 870HiSilicon Kirin 970 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
8. AMD FX-6200AMD FX-8350 AMD FX-6200 vs AMD FX-8350
9. Qualcomm Snapdragon 845HiSilicon Kirin 970 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
10. HiSilicon Kirin 810HiSilicon Kirin 970 HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970


back to index