Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD FX-4200 vs Intel Celeron N3450
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
AMD FX-4200
100 %
4C / 4T · 3.30 GHz
Intel Celeron N3450
76 %
4C / 4T · 2.20 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD FX-4200
100 %
4C / 4T · 3.30 GHz
Intel Celeron N3450
87 %
4C / 4T · 2.20 GHz
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU
383 entries
383 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-4200 | Intel Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD FX (30) | Intel Celeron (165) |
| CPU group | AMD FX-4100/4200 (5) | Intel Celeron J3000/N3000 (10) |
| Architecture | Zambezi (Bulldozer) | Braswell |
| Technology | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Notebook |
| Socket | AM3+ | BGA 1296 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-4200 | Intel Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 4x | 4x |
| Frequency: | 3.30 GHz | 1.10 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 2.20 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.20 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 8.00 MB | 2.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✓ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-4200 | Intel Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | Intel HD Graphics 500 |
| GPU frequency | 0.20 - 0.70 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | / | 12 / 96 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 8 GB | |
| Technology | 14 nm | |
| Release date | Q3/2016 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-4200 | Intel Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-4200 | Intel Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1866 (29.9 GB/s) | LPDDR4-2400 (29.9 GB/s) LPDDR3-1866 (29.9 GB/s) DDR3L-1866 (29.9 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 8 GB | |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 6 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 3.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-4200 | Intel Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125 W | 6 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | 4 W | |
| T. junction max. | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-4200 | Intel Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 |
| Release date | Q2/2012 | Q3/2016 |
| Release price | 107 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD FX-4200 is 5.0 stars (1 ratings), while Intel Celeron N3450 has received 3.7 stars (14 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
AMD FX-4200
4C / 4T · 0.00 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
4
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
5
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
6
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
7
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
8
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
9
Intel Celeron N3450
4C / 4T · 2.20 GHz
Popular Comparisons
