AMD FX-4200 vs HiSilicon Kirin 925
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD FX-4200 | HiSilicon Kirin 925 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD FX-4200 and the HiSilicon Kirin 925 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the AMD FX-4200 4 core processor released in Q2/2012 with the HiSilicon Kirin 925 which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q3/2014. |
||
| AMD FX (30) | Family | HiSilicon Kirin (29) |
| AMD FX-4100/4200 (5) | CPU group | HiSilicon Kirin 920 (3) |
| 1 | Generation | 2 |
| Zambezi (Bulldozer) | Architecture | Cortex-A15 / Cortex-A7 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD FX-4200 is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.30 GHz. The processor can compute 4 threads at the same time. The HiSilicon Kirin 925 clocks with 1.80 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. |
||
| AMD FX-4200 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 925 |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| Yes | Overclocking ? | No |
| 3.30 GHz | A-Core | 1.80 GHz 4x Cortex-A15 |
| -- | B-Core | 1.30 GHz 4x Cortex-A7 |
Internal GraphicsGraphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP4 |
| GPU frequency | 0.60 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 0.60 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | Midgard 2 |
| Technology | 32nm | |
| Max. displays | 1 | |
| -- | Compute units | 4 |
| -- | Shader | 64 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | 11 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP4 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeUp to GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the AMD FX-4200, while the HiSilicon Kirin 925 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled. |
||
| AMD FX-4200 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 925 |
| DDR3-1866 | Memory | LPDDR3-1600 |
| Max. Memory | ||
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 29.9 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 8.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe AMD FX-4200 has a TDP of 125 W. The TDP of the HiSilicon Kirin 925 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| AMD FX-4200 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 925 |
| 125 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD FX-4200 has 8.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 32 nm. The cache of HiSilicon Kirin 925 is at 0.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 28 nm. |
||
| AMD FX-4200 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 925 |
| 32 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv7-A (32 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX | ISA extensions | -- |
| AM3+ | Socket | -- |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q2/2012 | Release date | Q3/2014 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD FX-4200
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD FX-4200
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
AMD FX-4200
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925
ARM Mali-T628 MP4 @ 0.60 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD FX-4200
4C 4T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD FX-4200 | HiSilicon Kirin 925 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
