AMD EPYC 9754 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD EPYC 9754 | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD EPYC 9754 and the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the AMD EPYC 9754 128 core processor released in Q2/2023 with the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q1/2022. |
||
| AMD EPYC (129) | Family | Mediatek Dimensity (36) |
| AMD EPYC 8004/9004 (15) | CPU group | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (2) |
| 4 | Generation | 3 |
| Bergamo/Siena (Zen 4c) | Architecture | Cortex-X2 / -A710 / -A510 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 9754 is a 128 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.25 GHz (3.10 GHz). The processor can compute 256 threads at the same time. The MediaTek Dimensity 9000 clocks with 3.05 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9754 | Characteristic | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 |
| 128 | Cores | 8 |
| 256 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.25 GHz (3.10 GHz) 128x Zen 4c |
A-Core | 3.05 GHz 1x Cortex-X2 |
| -- | B-Core | 2.85 GHz 3x Cortex-A710 |
| -- | C-Core | 1.80 GHz 4x Cortex-A510 |
Internal GraphicsGraphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-G710 MP10 |
| GPU frequency | 0.85 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | Vallhall 3 |
| Technology | 4 nm | |
| Max. displays | 1 | |
| -- | Compute units | 10 |
| -- | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-G710 MP10 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | Decode |
| No | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VC-1 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeUp to 6144 GB of memory in a maximum of 12 memory channels is supported by the AMD EPYC 9754, while the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 supports a maximum of 16 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 60.0 GB/s enabled. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9754 | Characteristic | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 |
| DDR5-4800 | Memory | LPDDR5X-7500 |
| 6144 GB | Max. Memory | 16 GB |
| 12 | Memory channels | 4 (Quad Channel) |
| 460.8 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 60.0 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 256.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 5.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 128 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 504.1 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe AMD EPYC 9754 has a TDP of 360 W. The TDP of the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9754 | Characteristic | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 |
| 360 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| 400 W | TDP up | -- |
| 320 W | TDP down | -- |
| 100 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 9754 has 256.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 5 nm. The cache of MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is at 0.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 4 nm. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9754 | Characteristic | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 |
| 5 nm | Technology | 4 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv9-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI | ISA extensions | -- |
| SP5 | Socket | -- |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 | Operating systems | Android |
| Q2/2023 | Release date | Q1/2022 |
| 11900 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
128C 256T @ 2.25 GHz (3.10 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 3.05 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
MediaTek Dimensity 9000
8C 8T @ 3.05 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 9000
8C 8T @ 3.05 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 9000
ARM Mali-G710 MP10 @ 0.85 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 2.25 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 9000
8C 8T @ 3.05 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 9000
8C 8T @ 3.05 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD EPYC 9754 | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
News and articles for the AMD EPYC 9754 and the MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
