Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD EPYC 9455 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265U
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 9455 | Intel Core Ultra 7 265U |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD EPYC (147) | Intel Core Ultra 7 (31) |
| CPU group | AMD EPYC 9005 (29) | Intel Core Ultra 200U (4) |
| Architecture | Turin (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Meteor Lake U Refresh |
| Technology | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Segment | Server | Notebook |
| Socket | SP5 | BGA 2049 |
| Predecessor | Intel Core Ultra 7 165U | |
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 9455 | Intel Core Ultra 7 265U |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 48 / 96 | 12 / 14 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✓ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | normal | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 48x Zen 5 3.15 - 4.40 GHz |
2x Redwood Cove 2.10 - 5.30 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 8x Crestmont 1.70 - 4.20 GHz |
|
| Core Cluster 3: | 2x Crestmont 0.70 - 2.40 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 12.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 192.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 9455 | Intel Core Ultra 7 265U |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | Intel Iris Xe 4 Core Graphics 64 EUs (Meteor Lake) |
| GPU frequency | 0.60 - 2.10 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | / | 64 / 512 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✓ |
| Max. displays | 4 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 32 GB | |
| Technology | 5 nm | |
| Release date | Q4/2023 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 9455 | Intel Core Ultra 7 265U |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Intel® AI Boost | |
| AI specifications | Intel AI Boost @ 1.4 GHz (OpenVINO, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT) | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 9455 | Intel Core Ultra 7 265U |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR5-6000 (576.0 GB/s) | LPDDR5X-8400 (134.4 GB/s) DDR5-6400 (102.4 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 6144 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory channels | 12 | 2 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | 5.0 x 128 | 4.0 x 20 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 504.1 GB/s | 39.4 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 9455 | Intel Core Ultra 7 265U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300 W | 15 W |
| TDP (PL2) | 57 W | |
| TDP up | 300 W | |
| TDP down | 240 W | 12 W |
| T. junction max. | 100 °C | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 9455 | Intel Core Ultra 7 265U |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 | Windows 11, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 |
| Release date | Q3/2024 | Q1/2025 |
| Release price | 5412 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD EPYC 9455 is 0 stars (0 ratings), while Intel Core Ultra 7 265U has received 4.4 stars (8 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
7
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
8
Intel Core Ultra 7 265U
12C / 14T · 5.30 GHz
9
AMD EPYC 9455
48C / 96T · 4.40 GHz
Popular Comparisons
