AMD EPYC 7F52 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD EPYC 7F52 CPU1 vs CPU2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
AMD EPYC 7F52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

CPU comparison

AMD EPYC 7F52 or Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The AMD EPYC 7F52 has 16 cores with 32 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.90 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7F52 was released in Q2/2020.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz. The CPU supports up to 8 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 was released in Q1/2020.
AMD EPYC (129) Family Qualcomm Snapdragon (104)
AMD EPYC 7002 (24) CPU group Qualcomm Snapdragon 662/665 (2)
2 Generation 7
Rome (Zen 2) Architecture Kryo 260
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD EPYC 7F52 is a 16 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.50 GHz (3.90 GHz). The Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.00 GHz.

AMD EPYC 7F52 Characteristic Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
16 Cores 8
32 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
Yes Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
3.50 GHz (3.90 GHz) A-Core 2.00 GHz
4x Kryo 260 Gold
-- B-Core 1.80 GHz
4x Kryo 260 Silver

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

AMD EPYC 7F52 Characteristic Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
-- AI hardware Qualcomm AI engine
-- AI specifications Hexagon 683
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.

no iGPU GPU Qualcomm Adreno 610
GPU frequency --
-- GPU (Turbo) --
-- GPU Generation 6
Technology 11 nm
Max. displays 0
-- Compute units --
-- Shader 128
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory 4 GB
-- DirectX Version 12.1

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

no iGPU GPU Qualcomm Adreno 610
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 Decode
No Codec VP8 Decode
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC Decode
No Codec VC-1 Decode
No Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

The AMD EPYC 7F52 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 can connect up to 8 GB of memory in 2 memory channels.

AMD EPYC 7F52 Characteristic Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
DDR4-3200 Memory LPDDR4X-3733, LPDDR3-1866
Max. Memory 8 GB
8 (Octa Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
51.2 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 29.8 GB/s
Yes ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
256.00 MB L3 Cache --
4.0 PCIe version --
128 PCIe lanes --
252.0 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD EPYC 7F52 has a TDP of 240 W, that of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 is --.

AMD EPYC 7F52 Characteristic Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
240 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The AMD EPYC 7F52 has a 256.00 MB cache, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 cache has a total of 0.00 MB.

AMD EPYC 7F52 Characteristic Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
7 nm Technology 11 nm
Chiplet Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 ISA extensions --
SP3 Socket --
AMD-V, SVM Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Android
Q2/2020 Release date Q1/2020
3100 $ Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD EPYC 7F52 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 3.8 stars (6 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7F52 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (27%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7F52 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (9%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD EPYC 7F52 AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.90 GHz
1166 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
315 (27%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD EPYC 7F52 AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.70 GHz
14477 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
1325 (9%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD EPYC 7F52 AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.70 GHz
41028 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
3088 (8%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
AMD EPYC 7F52 AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.90 GHz
0 (0%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
334 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
AMD EPYC 7F52 AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.70 GHz
0 (0%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
1170 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD EPYC 7F52 AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.90 GHz
446 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD EPYC 7F52 AMD EPYC 7F52
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
Qualcomm Adreno 610 @ 0.00 GHz
273 (100%)

AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
AMD EPYC 7F52 AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.50 GHz
0 (0%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
209877 (100%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
AMD EPYC 7F52 AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.50 GHz
0 (0%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
176983 (100%)

Devices using this processor

AMD EPYC 7F52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 665Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4GQualcomm Snapdragon 662 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 720GQualcomm Snapdragon 662 Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
4. Samsung Exynos 9611Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 460Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 662Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 662Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 662 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
9. Qualcomm Snapdragon 662MediaTek Helio G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs MediaTek Helio G85
10. Samsung Exynos 850Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 Samsung Exynos 850 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662


back to index