AMD EPYC 7F32 vs Intel Celeron M 743
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD EPYC 7F32 | Intel Celeron M 743 | |
CPU comparisonAMD EPYC 7F32 or Intel Celeron M 743 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD EPYC 7F32 has 8 cores with 16 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.90 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7F32 was released in Q2/2020. The Intel Celeron M 743 has 1 cores with 1 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.30 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Intel Celeron M 743 was released in Q3/2009. |
||
| AMD EPYC (129) | Family | Intel Celeron (165) |
| AMD EPYC 7002 (24) | CPU group | Intel Celeron M 300 (2) |
| 2 | Generation | 0 |
| Rome (Zen 2) | Architecture | Dothan |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 7F32 has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 16 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7F32 is 3.70 GHz (3.90 GHz) while the Intel Celeron M 743 has 1 CPU cores and 1 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Celeron M 743 is at 1.30 GHz. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7F32 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron M 743 |
| 8 | Cores | 1 |
| 16 | Threads | 1 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 3.70 GHz | Frequency | 1.30 GHz |
| 3.90 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| 3.80 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD EPYC 7F32 can use up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 51.2 GB/s. The Intel Celeron M 743 supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7F32 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron M 743 |
| DDR4-3200 | Memory | |
| Max. Memory | ||
| 8 (Octa Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| 51.2 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | 1.00 MB |
| 128.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 4.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 128 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 252.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD EPYC 7F32 is 180 W, while the Intel Celeron M 743 has a TDP of 10 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7F32 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron M 743 |
| 180 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 10 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | 100 °C |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 7F32 is manufactured in 7 nm and has 128.00 MB cache. The Intel Celeron M 743 is manufactured in 90 nm and has a 1.00 MB cache. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7F32 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron M 743 |
| 7 nm | Technology | 90 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Monolithic |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-32 (32 bit) |
| SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | ISA extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2 |
| SP3 | Socket | BGA 956 |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q2/2020 | Release date | Q3/2009 |
| 2100 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
8C 16T @ 3.70 GHz (3.90 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
1C 1T @ 1.30 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD EPYC 7F32
8C 16T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
|
Intel Celeron M 743
1C 1T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7F32
8C 16T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron M 743
1C 1T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7F32
8C 16T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron M 743
1C 1T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7F32
8C 16T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron M 743
1C 1T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD EPYC 7F32 | Intel Celeron M 743 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
