AMD EPYC 7713P vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8260
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD EPYC 7713P | Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 | |
CPU comparisonAMD EPYC 7713P or Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD EPYC 7713P has 64 cores with 128 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.68 GHz. Up to 4096 GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7713P was released in Q1/2021. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 has 24 cores with 48 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.90 GHz. The CPU supports up to 1024 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 was released in Q2/2019. |
||
| AMD EPYC (129) | Family | Intel Xeon Platinum (89) |
| AMD EPYC 7003 (29) | CPU group | Intel Xeon Platinum 8200/9200 (21) |
| 3 | Generation | 2 |
| Milan (Zen 3) | Architecture | Cascade Lake |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 7713P has 64 CPU cores and can calculate 128 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7713P is 2.00 GHz (3.68 GHz) while the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 has 24 CPU cores and 48 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 is at 2.40 GHz (3.90 GHz). |
||
| AMD EPYC 7713P | Characteristic | Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 |
| 64 | Cores | 24 |
| 128 | Threads | 48 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.00 GHz | Frequency | 2.40 GHz |
| 3.68 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.90 GHz |
| 3.00 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 2.40 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD EPYC 7713P can use up to 4096 GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 204.8 GB/s. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 supports up to 1024 GB of memory in 6 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 140.7 GB/s. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7713P | Characteristic | Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 |
| DDR4-3200 | Memory | DDR4-2933 |
| 4096 GB | Max. Memory | 1024 GB |
| 8 (Octa Channel) | Memory channels | 6 (Hexa Channel) |
| 204.8 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 140.7 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 256.00 MB | L3 Cache | 35.75 MB |
| 4.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 128 | PCIe lanes | 48 |
| 252.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 47.3 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD EPYC 7713P is 225 W, while the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 has a TDP of 165 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7713P | Characteristic | Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 |
| 225 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 165 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| 240 W | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 7713P is manufactured in 7 nm and has 256.00 MB cache. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 is manufactured in 14 nm and has a 35.75 MB cache. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7713P | Characteristic | Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 |
| 7 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Monolithic |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 |
| SP3 | Socket | LGA 3647 |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q1/2021 | Release date | Q2/2019 |
| 5010 $ | Release price | 4702 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
64C 128T @ 2.00 GHz (3.68 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
24C 48T @ 2.40 GHz (3.90 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD EPYC 7713P
64C 128T @ 3.68 GHz |
||
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260
24C 48T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7713P
64C 128T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260
24C 48T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7713P
64C 128T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260
24C 48T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7713P
64C 128T @ 3.68 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260
24C 48T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7713P
64C 128T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260
24C 48T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD EPYC 7713P | Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
