AMD EPYC 7702 | MediaTek Helio P25 | |
CPU comparisonAMD EPYC 7702 or MediaTek Helio P25 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD EPYC 7702 has 64 cores with 128 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.35 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7702 was released in Q3/2019. The MediaTek Helio P25 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.60 GHz. The CPU supports up to 6 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The MediaTek Helio P25 was released in Q2/2017. |
||
AMD EPYC (129) | Family | Mediatek Helio (37) |
AMD EPYC 7002 (24) | CPU group | MediaTek Helio P20/P30 (4) |
2 | Generation | 2 |
Rome (Zen 2) | Architecture | Cortex-A53 |
Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
-- | Predecessor | -- |
-- | Successor | -- |
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 7702 is a 64 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.00 GHz (3.35 GHz). The MediaTek Helio P25 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.60 GHz. |
||
AMD EPYC 7702 | Characteristic | MediaTek Helio P25 |
64 | Cores | 8 |
128 | Threads | 8 |
normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
No | Overclocking ? | No |
2.00 GHz (3.35 GHz) | A-Core | 2.60 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
-- | B-Core | 1.60 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T880 MP2 |
GPU frequency | 1.00 GHz | |
-- | GPU (Turbo) | 1.00 GHz |
-- | GPU Generation | Midgard 4 |
Technology | 16 nm | |
Max. displays | 2 | |
-- | Compute units | 2 |
-- | Shader | 32 |
No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
No | Frame Generation | No |
-- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
-- | DirectX Version | 11 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T880 MP2 |
No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode |
No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
No | Codec VP9 | No |
No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
No | Codec AV1 | No |
No | Codec AVC | No |
No | Codec VC-1 | No |
No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD EPYC 7702 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The MediaTek Helio P25 can connect up to 6 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. |
||
AMD EPYC 7702 | Characteristic | MediaTek Helio P25 |
DDR4-3200 | Memory | LPDDR4X-1600, LPDDR4-1600, LPDDR3-933 |
Max. Memory | 6 GB | |
8 (Octa Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
51.2 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s |
Yes | ECC | No |
-- | L2 Cache | -- |
256.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
4.0 | PCIe version | -- |
128 | PCIe lanes | -- |
252.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD EPYC 7702 has a TDP of 200 W, that of the MediaTek Helio P25 is --. |
||
AMD EPYC 7702 | Characteristic | MediaTek Helio P25 |
200 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
-- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
-- | TDP up | -- |
-- | TDP down | -- |
-- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 7702 has a 256.00 MB cache, while the MediaTek Helio P25 cache has a total of 0.00 MB. |
||
AMD EPYC 7702 | Characteristic | MediaTek Helio P25 |
7 nm | Technology | 16 nm |
Chiplet | Chip design | Chiplet |
x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | ISA extensions | -- |
SP3 | Socket | -- |
AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | None |
Yes | AES-NI | No |
Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
Q3/2019 | Release date | Q2/2017 |
8000 $ | Release price | -- |
show more data | show more data | |
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
|||
MediaTek Helio P25
8C 8T @ 2.60 GHz |
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
|||
MediaTek Helio P25
8C 8T @ 2.60 GHz |
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
|||
MediaTek Helio P25
8C 8T @ 2.60 GHz |
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
|||
MediaTek Helio P25
8C 8T @ 2.60 GHz |
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
|||
MediaTek Helio P25
8C 8T @ 2.60 GHz |
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
|||
MediaTek Helio P25
8C 8T @ 2.60 GHz |
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
|||
MediaTek Helio P25
8C 8T @ 2.60 GHz |
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
|||
MediaTek Helio P25
8C 8T @ 2.60 GHz |
AMD EPYC 7702
@ 0.00 GHz |
|||
MediaTek Helio P25
ARM Mali-T880 MP2 @ 1.00 GHz |
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.00 GHz |
|||
MediaTek Helio P25
8C 8T @ 2.60 GHz |
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
|||
MediaTek Helio P25
8C 8T @ 2.60 GHz |
Devices using this processor |
|
AMD EPYC 7702 | MediaTek Helio P25 |
Unknown | Unknown |