AMD EPYC 7402 vs Intel Celeron G1610T

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD EPYC 7402 CPU1 vs CPU2 Intel Celeron G1610T
AMD EPYC 7402 Intel Celeron G1610T

CPU comparison

AMD EPYC 7402 or Intel Celeron G1610T - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The AMD EPYC 7402 has 24 cores with 48 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.35 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7402 was released in Q3/2019.

The Intel Celeron G1610T has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.30 GHz. The CPU supports up to 32 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron G1610T was released in Q1/2013.
AMD EPYC (129) Family Intel Celeron (165)
AMD EPYC 7002 (24) CPU group Intel Celeron G1000 (12)
2 Generation 3
Rome (Zen 2) Architecture Ivy Bridge S
Desktop / Server Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD EPYC 7402 has 24 CPU cores and can calculate 48 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7402 is 2.80 GHz (3.35 GHz) while the Intel Celeron G1610T has 2 CPU cores and 2 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Celeron G1610T is at 2.30 GHz.
AMD EPYC 7402 Characteristic Intel Celeron G1610T
24 Cores 2
48 Threads 2
normal Core architecture normal
Yes Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.80 GHz Frequency 2.30 GHz
3.35 GHz Turbo Frequency (1 Core) --
3.20 GHz Turbo Frequency (All Cores) --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.
AMD EPYC 7402 Characteristic Intel Celeron G1610T
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The AMD EPYC 7402 or Intel Celeron G1610T has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.
no iGPU GPU Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1)
GPU frequency 0.65 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) 1.05 GHz
-- GPU Generation 7
Technology 22 nm
Max. displays 3
-- Compute units 6
-- Shader 48
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory 2 GB
-- DirectX Version 11.0

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
no iGPU GPU Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1)
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC Decode / Encode
No Codec VC-1 Decode
No Codec JPEG Decode

Memory & PCIe

The AMD EPYC 7402 can use up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 51.2 GB/s. The Intel Celeron G1610T supports up to 32 GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 21.3 GB/s.
AMD EPYC 7402 Characteristic Intel Celeron G1610T
DDR4-3200 Memory DDR3-1333
Max. Memory 32 GB
8 (Octa Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
51.2 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 21.3 GB/s
Yes ECC Yes
-- L2 Cache --
128.00 MB L3 Cache 2.00 MB
4.0 PCIe version 2.0
128 PCIe lanes 16
252.0 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth 8.0 GB/s

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD EPYC 7402 is 180 W, while the Intel Celeron G1610T has a TDP of 35 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.
AMD EPYC 7402 Characteristic Intel Celeron G1610T
180 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 35 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The AMD EPYC 7402 is manufactured in 7 nm and has 128.00 MB cache. The Intel Celeron G1610T is manufactured in 22 nm and has a 2.00 MB cache.
AMD EPYC 7402 Characteristic Intel Celeron G1610T
7 nm Technology 22 nm
Chiplet Chip design Monolithic
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2
SP3 Socket LGA 1155
AMD-V, SVM Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Yes AES-NI Yes
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q3/2019 Release date Q1/2013
2900 $ Release price 42 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD EPYC 7402 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Intel Celeron G1610T to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7402 (100%)
Intel Celeron G1610T (39%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7402 (100%)
Intel Celeron G1610T (4%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD EPYC 7402 AMD EPYC 7402
24C 48T @ 3.35 GHz
1055 (100%)
Intel Celeron G1610T Intel Celeron G1610T
2C 2T @ 2.30 GHz
476 (45%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD EPYC 7402 AMD EPYC 7402
24C 48T @ 3.20 GHz
21494 (100%)
Intel Celeron G1610T Intel Celeron G1610T
2C 2T @ 2.30 GHz
854 (4%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
AMD EPYC 7402 AMD EPYC 7402
24C 48T @ 3.35 GHz
1299 (100%)
Intel Celeron G1610T Intel Celeron G1610T
2C 2T @ 2.30 GHz
412 (32%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
AMD EPYC 7402 AMD EPYC 7402
24C 48T @ 3.20 GHz
12622 (100%)
Intel Celeron G1610T Intel Celeron G1610T
2C 2T @ 2.30 GHz
712 (6%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD EPYC 7402 AMD EPYC 7402
24C 48T @ 3.20 GHz
47664 (100%)
Intel Celeron G1610T Intel Celeron G1610T
2C 2T @ 2.30 GHz
1370 (3%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD EPYC 7402 AMD EPYC 7402
24C 48T @ 3.35 GHz
391 (100%)
Intel Celeron G1610T Intel Celeron G1610T
2C 2T @ 2.30 GHz
0 (0%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD EPYC 7402 AMD EPYC 7402
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron G1610T Intel Celeron G1610T
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) @ 1.05 GHz
101 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD EPYC 7402 AMD EPYC 7402
24C 48T @ 3.35 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron G1610T Intel Celeron G1610T
2C 2T @ 2.30 GHz
81 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD EPYC 7402 AMD EPYC 7402
24C 48T @ 3.20 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron G1610T Intel Celeron G1610T
2C 2T @ 2.30 GHz
154 (100%)

Devices using this processor
AMD EPYC 7402 Intel Celeron G1610T
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD EPYC 7402PAMD EPYC 7402 AMD EPYC 7402P vs AMD EPYC 7402
2. Intel Celeron G1610TIntel Pentium N3700 Intel Celeron G1610T vs Intel Pentium N3700
3. AMD EPYC 7402AMD EPYC 7302 AMD EPYC 7402 vs AMD EPYC 7302
4. Intel Core i5-4300UIntel Celeron G1610T Intel Core i5-4300U vs Intel Celeron G1610T
5. Intel Celeron G1830Intel Celeron G1610T Intel Celeron G1830 vs Intel Celeron G1610T
6. Intel Celeron 3205UIntel Celeron G1610T Intel Celeron 3205U vs Intel Celeron G1610T
7. Intel Celeron G1610TIntel Core i3-4330T Intel Celeron G1610T vs Intel Core i3-4330T
8. Intel Celeron G1610TAMD A8-3520M Intel Celeron G1610T vs AMD A8-3520M
9. Intel Celeron G1610TAMD Phenom II X2 550 Intel Celeron G1610T vs AMD Phenom II X2 550
10. Intel Celeron G1610TAMD Phenom II X4 910e Intel Celeron G1610T vs AMD Phenom II X4 910e


back to index