AMD EPYC 73F3 vs Samsung Exynos 3470
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD EPYC 73F3 | Samsung Exynos 3470 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD EPYC 73F3 and the Samsung Exynos 3470 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the AMD EPYC 73F3 16 core processor released in Q1/2021 with the Samsung Exynos 3470 which has 4 CPU cores and was introduced in Q1/2014. |
||
| AMD EPYC (129) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| AMD EPYC 7003 (29) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 3400 (2) |
| 3 | Generation | 3 |
| Milan (Zen 3) | Architecture | Cortex-A7 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 73F3 is a 16 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.50 GHz (4.00 GHz). The processor can compute 32 threads at the same time. The Samsung Exynos 3470 clocks with 1.40 GHz, has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel. |
||
| AMD EPYC 73F3 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 3470 |
| 16 | Cores | 4 |
| 32 | Threads | 4 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 3.50 GHz | Frequency | 1.40 GHz |
| 4.00 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| 3.80 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Internal GraphicsGraphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 |
| GPU frequency | 0.45 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | Utgard |
| Technology | 28nm | |
| Max. displays | 1 | |
| -- | Compute units | 4 |
| -- | Shader | 64 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | 0 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeUp to 4096 GB of memory in a maximum of 8 memory channels is supported by the AMD EPYC 73F3, while the Samsung Exynos 3470 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled. |
||
| AMD EPYC 73F3 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 3470 |
| DDR4-3200 | Memory | LPDDR3-400 |
| 4096 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 8 (Octa Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| 204.8 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 256.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 4.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 128 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 252.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe AMD EPYC 73F3 has a TDP of 240 W. The TDP of the Samsung Exynos 3470 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| AMD EPYC 73F3 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 3470 |
| 240 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| 225 W | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 73F3 has 256.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 7 nm. The cache of Samsung Exynos 3470 is at 0.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 28 nm. |
||
| AMD EPYC 73F3 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 3470 |
| 7 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv7-A (32 bit) |
| SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | ISA extensions | -- |
| SP3 | Socket | -- |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q1/2021 | Release date | Q1/2014 |
| 3521 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
16C 32T @ 3.50 GHz (4.00 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
4C 4T @ 1.40 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD EPYC 73F3
16C 32T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 3470
4C 4T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 73F3
16C 32T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3470
4C 4T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
AMD EPYC 73F3
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3470
ARM Mali-400 MP4 @ 0.45 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD EPYC 73F3
16C 32T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 3470
4C 4T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD EPYC 73F3 | Samsung Exynos 3470 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
