AMD EPYC 7352 vs MediaTek Kompanio 820
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD EPYC 7352 | MediaTek Kompanio 820 | |
CPU comparisonAMD EPYC 7352 or MediaTek Kompanio 820 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD EPYC 7352 has 24 cores with 48 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7352 was released in Q3/2019. The MediaTek Kompanio 820 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.20 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The MediaTek Kompanio 820 was released in Q2/2021. |
||
| AMD EPYC (129) | Family | Mediatek Kompanio (9) |
| AMD EPYC 7002 (24) | CPU group | MediaTek Kompanio 52x/800 (4) |
| 2 | Generation | 2 |
| Rome (Zen 2) | Architecture | Cortex-A76 / Cortex-A55 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 7352 is a 24 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.30 GHz (3.20 GHz). The MediaTek Kompanio 820 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.20 GHz. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7352 | Characteristic | MediaTek Kompanio 820 |
| 24 | Cores | 8 |
| 48 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.30 GHz (3.20 GHz) | A-Core | 2.20 GHz 4x Cortex-A76 |
| -- | B-Core | 2.00 GHz 4x Cortex-A55 |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-G57 MP5 |
| GPU frequency | 0.01 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 0.01 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | Vallhall 1 |
| Technology | 7 nm | |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| -- | Compute units | 5 |
| -- | Shader | 80 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | 4 GB |
| -- | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-G57 MP5 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | Decode |
| No | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VC-1 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD EPYC 7352 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The MediaTek Kompanio 820 can connect up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7352 | Characteristic | MediaTek Kompanio 820 |
| DDR4-3200 | Memory | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max. Memory | ||
| 8 (Octa Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| 51.2 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 128.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 4.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 128 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 252.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD EPYC 7352 has a TDP of 155 W, that of the MediaTek Kompanio 820 is --. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7352 | Characteristic | MediaTek Kompanio 820 |
| 155 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 7352 has a 128.00 MB cache, while the MediaTek Kompanio 820 cache has a total of 0.00 MB. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7352 | Characteristic | MediaTek Kompanio 820 |
| 7 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | ISA extensions | -- |
| SP3 | Socket | -- |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q3/2019 | Release date | Q2/2021 |
| 2750 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
24C 48T @ 2.30 GHz (3.20 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD EPYC 7352
24C 48T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
MediaTek Kompanio 820
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7352
24C 48T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Kompanio 820
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7352
24C 48T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Kompanio 820
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7352
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Kompanio 820
ARM Mali-G57 MP5 @ 0.01 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7352
24C 48T @ 2.30 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Kompanio 820
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7352
24C 48T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Kompanio 820
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD EPYC 7352 | MediaTek Kompanio 820 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
