AMD EPYC 7302P vs Samsung Exynos 8895

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD EPYC 7302P CPU1 vs CPU2 Samsung Exynos 8895
AMD EPYC 7302P Samsung Exynos 8895

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD EPYC 7302P and the Samsung Exynos 8895 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the AMD EPYC 7302P 16 core processor released in Q3/2019 with the Samsung Exynos 8895 which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q2/2017.
AMD EPYC (129) Family Samsung Exynos (47)
AMD EPYC 7002 (24) CPU group Samsung Exynos 8895 (1)
2 Generation 2
Rome (Zen 2) Architecture Exynos M2 / Cortex-A53
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD EPYC 7302P is a 16 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.00 GHz (3.30 GHz). The processor can compute 32 threads at the same time. The Samsung Exynos 8895 clocks with 2.30 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel.

AMD EPYC 7302P Characteristic Samsung Exynos 8895
16 Cores 8
32 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
Yes Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
3.00 GHz (3.30 GHz) A-Core 2.30 GHz
4x Exynos M2 (Mongoose)
-- B-Core 1.70 GHz
4x Cortex-A53

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

AMD EPYC 7302P Characteristic Samsung Exynos 8895
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-G71 MP20
GPU frequency 0.90 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) 0.90 GHz
-- GPU Generation Bifrost 1
Technology 16 nm
Max. displays 2
-- Compute units 20
-- Shader 320
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory 2 GB
-- DirectX Version 11

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-G71 MP20
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC Decode / Encode
No Codec VC-1 No
No Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

Up to GB of memory in a maximum of 8 memory channels is supported by the AMD EPYC 7302P, while the Samsung Exynos 8895 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled.

AMD EPYC 7302P Characteristic Samsung Exynos 8895
DDR4-3200 Memory LPDDR4-1866
Max. Memory
8 (Octa Channel) Memory channels 0
51.2 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
Yes ECC No
-- L2 Cache 2.00 MB
128.00 MB L3 Cache --
4.0 PCIe version --
128 PCIe lanes --
252.0 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The AMD EPYC 7302P has a TDP of 155 W. The TDP of the Samsung Exynos 8895 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

AMD EPYC 7302P Characteristic Samsung Exynos 8895
155 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The AMD EPYC 7302P has 128.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 7 nm. The cache of Samsung Exynos 8895 is at 2.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 10 nm.

AMD EPYC 7302P Characteristic Samsung Exynos 8895
7 nm Technology 10 nm
Chiplet Chip design Unknown
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 ISA extensions --
SP3 Socket --
AMD-V, SVM Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Android
Q3/2019 Release date Q2/2017
2850 $ Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD EPYC 7302P to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 8895 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 5.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P (100%)
Samsung Exynos 8895 (34%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P (100%)
Samsung Exynos 8895 (10%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD EPYC 7302P AMD EPYC 7302P
16C 32T @ 3.30 GHz
1043 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 8895 Samsung Exynos 8895
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
362 (35%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD EPYC 7302P AMD EPYC 7302P
16C 32T @ 3.20 GHz
16674 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 8895 Samsung Exynos 8895
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
1407 (8%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
AMD EPYC 7302P AMD EPYC 7302P
16C 32T @ 3.30 GHz
1322 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 8895 Samsung Exynos 8895
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
421 (32%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
AMD EPYC 7302P AMD EPYC 7302P
16C 32T @ 3.20 GHz
11563 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 8895 Samsung Exynos 8895
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
1367 (12%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD EPYC 7302P AMD EPYC 7302P
16C 32T @ 3.20 GHz
32547 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 8895 Samsung Exynos 8895
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
3073 (9%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD EPYC 7302P AMD EPYC 7302P
16C 32T @ 3.30 GHz
384 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 8895 Samsung Exynos 8895
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
0 (0%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD EPYC 7302P AMD EPYC 7302P
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 8895 Samsung Exynos 8895
ARM Mali-G71 MP20 @ 0.90 GHz
612 (100%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
AMD EPYC 7302P AMD EPYC 7302P
16C 32T @ 3.00 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 8895 Samsung Exynos 8895
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
175045 (100%)

Devices using this processor

AMD EPYC 7302P Samsung Exynos 8895
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD EPYC 7313PAMD EPYC 7302P AMD EPYC 7313P vs AMD EPYC 7302P
2. AMD EPYC 7302AMD EPYC 7302P AMD EPYC 7302 vs AMD EPYC 7302P
3. AMD EPYC 7302PAMD EPYC 7282 AMD EPYC 7302P vs AMD EPYC 7282
4. Samsung Exynos 8895Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 Samsung Exynos 8895 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
5. AMD EPYC 7302PAMD EPYC 7402P AMD EPYC 7302P vs AMD EPYC 7402P
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GSamsung Exynos 8895 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Samsung Exynos 8895
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 720GSamsung Exynos 8895 Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs Samsung Exynos 8895
8. AMD EPYC 7302PAMD Ryzen 9 3950X AMD EPYC 7302P vs AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
9. Samsung Exynos 8895Samsung Exynos 2100 Samsung Exynos 8895 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
10. AMD EPYC 7302PAMD Ryzen 7 3700X AMD EPYC 7302P vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700X


back to index