Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD E-350 vs Apple A14 Bionic
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
AMD E-350
8 %
2C / 2T · 1.60 GHz
Apple A14 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 3.00 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD E-350
6 %
2C / 2T · 1.60 GHz
Apple A14 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 3.00 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
AMD E-350
11 %
AMD Radeon HD 6310
Apple A14 Bionic
100 %
Apple A14
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
90 entries
90 entries
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
118 entries
118 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
AI performance (NPU)
218 entries
218 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD E-350 | Apple A14 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD E (23) | Apple A series (27) |
| CPU group | AMD E/E1/E2-1000 (5) | Apple A14 (1) |
| Architecture | Zacate (Bobcat) | A14 (Firestorm/Icestorm) |
| Technology | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | BGA 413 | |
| Predecessor | Apple A13 Bionic | |
| Successor | Apple A15 Bionic (5-GPU) |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD E-350 | Apple A14 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 6 / 6 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 2x 1.60 GHz |
2x Firestorm 3.00 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 4x Icestorm 1.82 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 12.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 1.00 MB | 16.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD E-350 | Apple A14 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | AMD Radeon HD 6310 | Apple A14 |
| GPU frequency | 0.49 GHz | 1.46 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 1 / 80 | 16 / 256 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 1 GB | 6 GB |
| Technology | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Release date | Q4/2010 | Q3/2020 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD E-350 | Apple A14 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Apple Neural Engine | |
| AI specifications | 16 Neural cores @ 11 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD E-350 | Apple A14 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1066 (8.5 GB/s) | LPDDR4X-4266 (34.1 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 6 GB | |
| Memory channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | ||
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD E-350 | Apple A14 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 18 W | 7.25 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD E-350 | Apple A14 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | iOS | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX | |
| Release date | Q1/2011 | Q3/2020 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD E-350 is 3.3 stars (7 ratings), while Apple A14 Bionic has received 3.9 stars (242 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
5
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
6
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
7
Apple M1 Max (24-GPU)
10C / 10T · 3.20 GHz
8
Apple A14 Bionic
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
9
AMD E-350
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
