AMD E-300 vs Samsung Exynos 1080
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD E-300 | Samsung Exynos 1080 | |
CPU comparisonAMD E-300 or Samsung Exynos 1080 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD E-300 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.30 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 1 memory channels. The AMD E-300 was released in Q3/2011. The Samsung Exynos 1080 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.80 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 1080 was released in Q4/2020. |
||
| AMD E (23) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| AMD E/E1/E2-1000 (5) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 1080 (1) |
| 1 | Generation | 5 |
| Zacate (Bobcat) | Architecture | Cortex-A78/-A78/-A55 |
| Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD E-300 has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD E-300 is 1.30 GHz while the Samsung Exynos 1080 has 8 CPU cores and 8 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 1080 is at 2.80 GHz. |
||
| AMD E-300 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 1080 |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 1.30 GHz | A-Core | 2.80 GHz 1x Cortex-A78 |
| -- | B-Core | 2.60 GHz 3x Cortex-A78 |
| -- | C-Core | 2.00 GHz 4x Cortex-A55 |
Internal GraphicsThe AMD E-300 or Samsung Exynos 1080 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| AMD Radeon HD 6310 | GPU | ARM Mali-G78 MP10 |
| 0.49 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.76 GHz |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| 3 | GPU Generation | Vallhall 2 |
| 40 nm | Technology | 5 nm |
| 2 | Max. displays | 1 |
| 1 | Compute units | 10 |
| 80 | Shader | 160 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 1 GB | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 11 | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| AMD Radeon HD 6310 | GPU | ARM Mali-G78 MP10 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| Decode | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | Decode |
| Decode | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| Decode | Codec VC-1 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD E-300 can use up to GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 8.5 GB/s. The Samsung Exynos 1080 supports up to GB of memory in 4 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --. |
||
| AMD E-300 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 1080 |
| DDR3-1066 | Memory | LPDDR5, LPDDR4X |
| Max. Memory | ||
| 1 (Single Channel) | Memory channels | 4 (Quad Channel) |
| 8.5 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| No | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 1.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD E-300 is 18 W, while the Samsung Exynos 1080 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| AMD E-300 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 1080 |
| 18 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD E-300 is manufactured in 32 nm and has 1.00 MB cache. The Samsung Exynos 1080 is manufactured in 5 nm and has a 0.00 MB cache. |
||
| AMD E-300 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 1080 |
| 32 nm | Technology | 5 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX | ISA extensions | -- |
| BGA 413 | Socket | -- |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Operating systems | Android | |
| Q3/2011 | Release date | Q4/2020 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
2C 2T @ 1.30 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD E-300
2C 2T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 1080
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD E-300
2C 2T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 1080
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
AMD E-300
AMD Radeon HD 6310 @ 0.49 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 1080
ARM Mali-G78 MP10 @ 0.76 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
AMD E-300
2C 2T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 1080
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD E-300
2C 2T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 1080
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
|
|
AMD E-300
2C 2T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 1080
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD E-300 | Samsung Exynos 1080 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
