Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD E-300 vs Intel Celeron N2808
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
AMD E-300
48 %
2C / 2T · 1.30 GHz
Intel Celeron N2808
100 %
2C / 2T · 2.25 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD E-300
46 %
2C / 2T · 1.30 GHz
Intel Celeron N2808
100 %
2C / 2T · 2.25 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
AMD E-300
100 %
AMD Radeon HD 6310
Intel Celeron N2808
64 %
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU
383 entries
383 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD E-300 | Intel Celeron N2808 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD E (23) | Intel Celeron (165) |
| CPU group | AMD E/E1/E2-1000 (5) | Intel Celeron J1000/N2000 (17) |
| Architecture | Zacate (Bobcat) | Bay Trail |
| Technology | 32 nm | 22 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Notebook |
| Socket | BGA 413 | BGA 1170 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD E-300 | Intel Celeron N2808 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x | 2x |
| Frequency: | 1.30 GHz | 1.58 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 2.25 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.25 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 1.00 MB | 1.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD E-300 | Intel Celeron N2808 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | AMD Radeon HD 6310 | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) |
| GPU frequency | 0.49 GHz | 0.31 - 0.79 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 1 / 80 | 4 / 32 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | 2 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Technology | 40 nm | 22 nm |
| Release date | Q4/2010 | Q3/2013 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD E-300 | Intel Celeron N2808 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD E-300 | Intel Celeron N2808 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1066 (8.5 GB/s) | DDR3-1333 (10.7 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 4 GB | |
| Memory channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 4 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 2.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD E-300 | Intel Celeron N2808 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 18 W | 4.5 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | 3 W | |
| T. junction max. | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD E-300 | Intel Celeron N2808 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 |
| Release date | Q3/2011 | Q2/2014 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD E-300 is 2.9 stars (11 ratings), while Intel Celeron N2808 has received 3.6 stars (5 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M4 (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 4.46 GHz
7
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
8
Intel Celeron N2808
2C / 2T · 2.25 GHz
9
AMD E-300
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
