Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD E2-6110 vs Intel Celeron J4005
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
AMD E2-6110
35 %
4C / 4T · 1.50 GHz
Intel Celeron J4005
100 %
2C / 2T · 2.70 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD E2-6110
57 %
4C / 4T · 1.50 GHz
Intel Celeron J4005
100 %
2C / 2T · 2.70 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
AMD E2-6110
95 %
AMD Radeon R2 (Beema)
Intel Celeron J4005
100 %
Intel UHD Graphics 600
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD E2-6110 | Intel Celeron J4005 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD E (23) | Intel Celeron (165) |
| CPU group | AMD E1/E2-6000 (2) | Intel Celeron J4000/N4000/N5000 (11) |
| Architecture | Beema (Puma) | Gemini Lake |
| Technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Notebook |
| Socket | AM1 | BGA 1090 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD E2-6110 | Intel Celeron J4005 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 4x | 2x |
| Frequency: | 1.50 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 2.70 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.70 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 2.00 MB | 4.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD E2-6110 | Intel Celeron J4005 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | AMD Radeon R2 (Beema) | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
| GPU frequency | 0.50 GHz | 0.25 - 0.70 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 2 / 128 | 12 / 96 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Release date | Q1/2015 | Q4/2017 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD E2-6110 | Intel Celeron J4005 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD E2-6110 | Intel Celeron J4005 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3L-1600 (12.8 GB/s) | LPDDR4-2400 (38.4 GB/s) DDR4-2400 (38.4 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 8 GB | |
| Memory channels | 1 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 6 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 3.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD E2-6110 | Intel Celeron J4005 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15 W | 10 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD E2-6110 | Intel Celeron J4005 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 |
| Release date | Q2/2014 | Q4/2017 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD E2-6110 is 3.0 stars (14 ratings), while Intel Celeron J4005 has received 1.7 stars (6 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M4 (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 4.46 GHz
7
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
8
AMD E2-6110
4C / 4T · 0.00 GHz
9
Intel Celeron J4005
2C / 2T · 2.70 GHz
Popular Comparisons
