Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD C-50 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
AMD C-50
1 %
AMD Radeon HD 6250
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
100 %
Intel Arc 140T
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD C-50 | Intel Core Ultra 7 265H |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD C (6) | Intel Core Ultra 7 (31) |
| CPU group | AMD C (6) | Intel Core Ultra 200H (5) |
| Architecture | Ontario (Bobcat) | Arrow Lake H |
| Technology | 40 nm | 3 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Notebook |
| Socket | BGA 413 | BGA 2049 |
| Predecessor | Intel Core Ultra 7 165H | |
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD C-50 | Intel Core Ultra 7 265H |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 16 / 16 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 2x 1.00 GHz |
6x Lion Cove 2.20 - 5.30 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 8x Skymont 1.70 - 4.50 GHz |
|
| Core Cluster 3: | 2x Crestmont 0.70 - 2.50 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 6.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 1.00 MB | 24.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✓ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD C-50 | Intel Core Ultra 7 265H |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | AMD Radeon HD 6250 | Intel Arc 140T |
| GPU frequency | 0.28 GHz | 0.60 - 2.30 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 1 / 80 | 64 / 1024 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✓ |
| Max. displays | 2 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 1 GB | 32 GB |
| Technology | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Release date | Q4/2010 | Q1/2025 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD C-50 | Intel Core Ultra 7 265H |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Intel® AI Boost | |
| AI specifications | Intel AI Boost (OpenVINO, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT) | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU | 97 TOPS |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD C-50 | Intel Core Ultra 7 265H |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1066 (8.5 GB/s) | LPDDR5X-8400 (134.4 GB/s) DDR5-6400 (102.4 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 128 GB | |
| Memory channels | 1 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 5.0 x 28 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 110.3 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD C-50 | Intel Core Ultra 7 265H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 9 W | 28 W |
| TDP (PL2) | 115 W | |
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | 20 W | |
| T. junction max. | 110 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD C-50 | Intel Core Ultra 7 265H |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 11, Linux | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE3, SSE4a | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 |
| Release date | Q1/2011 | Q1/2025 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD C-50 is 3.0 stars (10 ratings), while Intel Core Ultra 7 265H has received 4.0 stars (15 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
5
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
6
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
7
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
8
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
16C / 16T · 5.30 GHz
9
AMD C-50
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
