Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD A9-9425 vs Intel Core i3-3229Y
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
AMD A9-9425
100 %
2C / 2T · 3.70 GHz
Intel Core i3-3229Y
63 %
2C / 4T · 1.40 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD A9-9425
100 %
2C / 2T · 3.10 GHz
Intel Core i3-3229Y
79 %
2C / 4T · 1.40 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
AMD A9-9425
100 %
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
Intel Core i3-3229Y
67 %
Intel HD Graphics 4000
More benchmarks
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
213 entries
213 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD A9-9425 | Intel Core i3-3229Y |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD A (112) | Intel Core i3 (205) |
| CPU group | AMD A9-9000 (4) | Intel Core i 3000Y (4) |
| Architecture | Stoney Ridge (Excavator) | Ivy Bridge Y |
| Technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Notebook |
| Socket | FP4 | BGA 1023 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD A9-9425 | Intel Core i3-3229Y |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x | 2x |
| Frequency: | 3.10 GHz | 1.40 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 3.70 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 3.10 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 2.00 MB | 3.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD A9-9425 | Intel Core i3-3229Y |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
| GPU frequency | 0.85 GHz | 0.35 - 0.85 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 3 / 192 | 16 / 128 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Release date | Q2/2016 | Q1/2011 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD A9-9425 | Intel Core i3-3229Y |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD A9-9425 | Intel Core i3-3229Y |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR4-2133 (17.1 GB/s) | DDR3-1600 (25.6 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory channels | 1 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 8 | 2.0 x 16 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 7.9 GB/s | 8.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD A9-9425 | Intel Core i3-3229Y |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15 W | 13 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | 25 W | |
| TDP down | 10 W | 7 W |
| T. junction max. | 90 °C | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD A9-9425 | Intel Core i3-3229Y |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX |
| Release date | Q2/2017 | Q1/2013 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD A9-9425 is 2.1 stars (16 ratings), while Intel Core i3-3229Y has received 0 stars (0 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M4 (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 4.46 GHz
7
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
8
AMD A9-9425
2C / 2T · 3.70 GHz
9
Intel Core i3-3229Y
2C / 4T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
