Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD A4-5000 vs Apple A11 Bionic
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
AMD A4-5000
19 %
4C / 4T · 1.50 GHz
Apple A11 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 2.39 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD A4-5000
22 %
4C / 4T · 1.50 GHz
Apple A11 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 2.39 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
AMD A4-5000
31 %
AMD Radeon HD 8330
Apple A11 Bionic
100 %
Apple A11
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
118 entries
118 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU
383 entries
383 entries
AI performance (NPU)
218 entries
218 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD A4-5000 | Apple A11 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD A (112) | Apple A series (27) |
| CPU group | AMD A4-5000 (5) | Apple A11 (1) |
| Architecture | Kabini (Jaguar) | A11 |
| Technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | ||
| Predecessor | Apple A10 Fusion | |
| Successor | Apple A12 Bionic |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD A4-5000 | Apple A11 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 6 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 4x 1.50 GHz |
2x Monsoon 2.39 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 4x Mistral 1.19 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 8.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 2.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✓ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD A4-5000 | Apple A11 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | AMD Radeon HD 8330 | Apple A11 |
| GPU frequency | 0.50 GHz | 1.07 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 2 / 128 | 12 / 192 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | 1 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Release date | Q2/2013 | Q3/2017 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD A4-5000 | Apple A11 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Apple Neural Engine | |
| AI specifications | 2 Neural cores @ 0.6 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD A4-5000 | Apple A11 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3L-1600 (25.6 GB/s) | LPDDR4X-4266 (34.1 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 3 GB | |
| Memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | ||
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD A4-5000 | Apple A11 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15 W | 8 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD A4-5000 | Apple A11 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | iOS | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX | |
| Release date | Q3/2013 | Q3/2017 |
| Release price | 115 $ | |
| Documents |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD A4-5000 is 3.1 stars (9 ratings), while Apple A11 Bionic has received 3.6 stars (56 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
5
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
6
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
7
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
8
Apple A11 Bionic
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
9
AMD A4-5000
4C / 4T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
