AMD A10-9620P vs AMD EPYC 9374F

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD A10-9620P CPU1 vs CPU2 AMD EPYC 9374F
AMD A10-9620P AMD EPYC 9374F

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD A10-9620P and the AMD EPYC 9374F and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the AMD A10-9620P 4 core processor released in Q4/2016 with the AMD EPYC 9374F which has 32 CPU cores and was introduced in Q4/2022.
AMD A (112) Family AMD EPYC (129)
AMD A10-9600 (2) CPU group AMD EPYC 9004 (21)
6 Generation 4
Excavator (Bristol Ridge) Architecture Genoa / Genoa-X (Zen 4)
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD A10-9620P is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.50 GHz (3.40 GHz). The processor can compute 4 threads at the same time. The AMD EPYC 9374F clocks with 3.85 GHz (4.30 GHz), has 32 CPU cores and can calculate 64 threads in parallel.

AMD A10-9620P Characteristic AMD EPYC 9374F
4 Cores 32
4 Threads 64
normal Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking ? No
2.50 GHz Frequency 3.85 GHz
3.40 GHz Turbo Frequency (1 Core) 4.30 GHz
2.70 GHz Turbo Frequency (All Cores) 4.10 GHz

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

AMD A10-9620P Characteristic AMD EPYC 9374F
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

AMD Radeon R5 - 384 (Bristol Ridge) GPU no iGPU
0.76 GHz GPU frequency --
-- GPU (Turbo) --
6 GPU Generation --
28 nm Technology
2 Max. displays
5 Compute units --
384 Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
2 GB Max. GPU Memory --
12 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

AMD Radeon R5 - 384 (Bristol Ridge) GPU no iGPU
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode Codec h264 No
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
Decode Codec AVC No
Decode Codec VC-1 No
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

Up to 64 GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the AMD A10-9620P, while the AMD EPYC 9374F supports a maximum of 6144 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 460.8 GB/s enabled.

AMD A10-9620P Characteristic AMD EPYC 9374F
DDR4-1866 Memory DDR5-4800
64 GB Max. Memory 6144 GB
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 12
29.9 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 460.8 GB/s
No ECC Yes
2.00 MB L2 Cache 32.00 MB
-- L3 Cache 256.00 MB
3.0 PCIe version 5.0
8 PCIe lanes 128
7.9 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth 504.1 GB/s

Thermal Management

The AMD A10-9620P has a TDP of 15 W. The TDP of the AMD EPYC 9374F is 320 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

AMD A10-9620P Characteristic AMD EPYC 9374F
15 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 320 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up 400 W
-- TDP down --
90 °C Tjunction max. 100 °C

Technical details

The AMD A10-9620P has 2.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 28 nm. The cache of AMD EPYC 9374F is at 288.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 5 nm.

AMD A10-9620P Characteristic AMD EPYC 9374F
28 nm Technology 5 nm
Unknown Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, FMA4 ISA extensions SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI
FP4 Socket SP5
AMD-V Virtualization AMD-V, SVM
Yes AES-NI Yes
Operating systems Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11
Q4/2016 Release date Q4/2022
-- Release price 4850 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD A10-9620P to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the AMD EPYC 9374F to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 5.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:


Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD A10-9620P AMD A10-9620P
4C 4T @ 3.40 GHz
485 (100%)
AMD EPYC 9374F AMD EPYC 9374F
32C 64T @ 4.30 GHz
0 (0%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD A10-9620P AMD A10-9620P
4C 4T @ 2.70 GHz
1239 (100%)
AMD EPYC 9374F AMD EPYC 9374F
32C 64T @ 4.10 GHz
0 (0%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD A10-9620P AMD A10-9620P
AMD Radeon R5 - 384 (Bristol Ridge) @ 0.76 GHz
579 (100%)
AMD EPYC 9374F AMD EPYC 9374F
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD A10-9620P AMD A10-9620P
4C 4T @ 2.70 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD EPYC 9374F AMD EPYC 9374F
32C 64T @ 4.10 GHz
99082 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD A10-9620P AMD A10-9620P
4C 4T @ 3.40 GHz
76 (100%)
AMD EPYC 9374F AMD EPYC 9374F
32C 64T @ 4.30 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD A10-9620P AMD A10-9620P
4C 4T @ 2.70 GHz
226 (100%)
AMD EPYC 9374F AMD EPYC 9374F
32C 64T @ 4.10 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

AMD A10-9620P AMD EPYC 9374F
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD EPYC 9354AMD EPYC 9374F AMD EPYC 9354 vs AMD EPYC 9374F
2. AMD A10-9620PIntel Core i7-10610U AMD A10-9620P vs Intel Core i7-10610U
3. Intel Core i5-4570AMD A10-9620P Intel Core i5-4570 vs AMD A10-9620P
4. AMD EPYC 9374FAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX AMD EPYC 9374F vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
5. AMD A10-9620PIntel Core i5-6200U AMD A10-9620P vs Intel Core i5-6200U
6. AMD EPYC 9374FAMD Ryzen 9 7950X AMD EPYC 9374F vs AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
7. AMD EPYC 9374FAMD EPYC 9174F AMD EPYC 9374F vs AMD EPYC 9174F
8. AMD A10-9620PIntel Celeron N5095 AMD A10-9620P vs Intel Celeron N5095
9. AMD EPYC 9374FAMD EPYC 9474F AMD EPYC 9374F vs AMD EPYC 9474F
10. AMD A10-9620PIntel Celeron N5105 AMD A10-9620P vs Intel Celeron N5105


back to index