UNISOC T770 vs Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


UNISOC T770 CPU1 vs CPU2 Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2
UNISOC T770 Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2

CPU comparison

UNISOC T770 or Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The UNISOC T770 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.50 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The UNISOC T770 was released in Q1/2020.

The Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2 has 15 cores with 30 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.40 GHz. The CPU supports up to 1536 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2 was released in Q1/2014.
UNISOC 5G (3) Family Intel Xeon E7 (20)
UNISOC 5G 6nm (2) CPU group Intel Xeon E7 v2 (20)
0 Generation 4
-- Architecture Ivy Bridge EX
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The UNISOC T770 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.50 GHz. The Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2 has 15 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.80 GHz (3.40 GHz).

UNISOC T770 Characteristic Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2
8 Cores 15
8 Threads 30
hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking ? No
2.50 GHz
1x Cortex-A76
A-Core 2.80 GHz (3.40 GHz)
2.20 GHz
3x Cortex-A76
B-Core --
2.00 GHz
4x Cortex-A55
C-Core --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

UNISOC T770 Characteristic Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.

ARM Mali-G57 MP4 GPU no iGPU
0.78 GHz GPU frequency --
-- GPU (Turbo) --
Vallhall 1 GPU Generation --
7 nm Technology
2 Max. displays
4 Compute units --
64 Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
4 GB Max. GPU Memory --
12 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

ARM Mali-G57 MP4 GPU no iGPU
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 No
Decode Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC No
Decode / Encode Codec VC-1 No
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The UNISOC T770 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2 can connect up to 1536 GB of memory in 4 memory channels.

UNISOC T770 Characteristic Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2
LPDDR4X-2133, Memory DDR3-1600
Max. Memory 1536 GB
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 4 (Quad Channel)
-- Max. Bandwidth 51.2 GB/s
No ECC Yes
-- L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache 38.00 MB
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The UNISOC T770 has a TDP of --, that of the Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2 is 155 W.

UNISOC T770 Characteristic Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 155 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The UNISOC T770 has a 0.00 MB cache, while the Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2 cache has a total of 38.00 MB.

UNISOC T770 Characteristic Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2
6 nm Technology 22 nm
Unknown Chip design Monolithic
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX
-- Socket LGA 2011
None Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
No AES-NI Yes
Android Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q1/2020 Release date Q1/2014
-- Release price 4700 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the UNISOC T770 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 5.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
UNISOC T770 UNISOC T770
8C 8T @ 2.50 GHz
619 (100%)
Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2 Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2
15C 30T @ 3.40 GHz
0 (0%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
UNISOC T770 UNISOC T770
8C 8T @ 2.50 GHz
2207 (100%)
Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2 Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2
15C 30T @ 3.40 GHz
0 (0%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
UNISOC T770 UNISOC T770
ARM Mali-G57 MP4 @ 0.78 GHz
399 (100%)
Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2 Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)

AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
UNISOC T770 UNISOC T770
8C 8T @ 2.50 GHz
420306 (100%)
Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2 Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2
15C 30T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

UNISOC T770 Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2 vs Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3
2. Intel Xeon E7-4890 v2Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2 Intel Xeon E7-4890 v2 vs Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2
3. Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2 vs Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2
4. Intel Core i7-4790KIntel Xeon E7-2890 v2 Intel Core i7-4790K vs Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2
5. Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2Intel Atom D2550 Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2 vs Intel Atom D2550
6. Intel Core i7-4770KIntel Xeon E7-2890 v2 Intel Core i7-4770K vs Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2
7. Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2AMD Phenom II X4 830 Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2 vs AMD Phenom II X4 830
8. AMD Phenom II X2 565Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2 AMD Phenom II X2 565 vs Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2
9. Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3 Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2 vs Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3
10. Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2AMD FX-9590 Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2 vs AMD FX-9590


back to index